50 U.S.C. § 402
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56
cases, 1961–2013 · leading case: Wilner v. Nat'l Sec. Agency, 592 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2009).
Wilner v. Nat'l Sec. Agency, 592 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2009). “63 , 64 (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 402 note), which provides that: [N]othing in this Act or any other law .”
Larson v. Dep't of State, 565 F.3d 857 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “” 50 U.S.C. § 402 note. Section 6 qualifies as an Exemption 3 statute, Hayden, 608 F.”
The Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. Nat'l Sec. Agency, 610 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “63 (1959), codified at 50 U.S.C. § 402 note (1976), quoted in text infra at note 25.”
New York Times Co. v. United States Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). “§ 798 , which prohibits disclosure of, among other things, information “concerning the intelligence activities of the United States”; and Section 6 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959, 50 U.S.C. § 402 note (“Section 6”), which states “nothing in this Act or any other law…”
Armstrong v. Exec. Off. of the President, 877 F. Supp. 690 (D.D.C. 1995). “50 U.S.C. § 402 . Pursuant to the Reorganization Plan No.”
Cna Fin. Corp. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, 830 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “2d 824, 827 (1979) (subsection (A) not satisfied by 50 U.S.C. § 402 note, relating to secrecy of information about the National Security Agency) with Seymour v.”
Lahr v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 569 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2009). “63 , 64 (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. § 402 note). 19 . The district court does not expressly state that it found the simulation inputs to be deliberative, but it is clear that it so held from the discussion as a whole.”
Nat'l Sec. Counselors v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 960 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2013). “63 , 64 (1959), 50 U.S.C. § 402 note. See Hayden, 608 F.2d at 1389-90 .”
Moore v. Bush, 601 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2009). “63 , 64 (1959), quoted in 50 U.S.C. § 402 note (Section 6 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959 provides: “[NJothing in this Act or any other law .”
Hepting v. AT & T Corp., 439 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2006). “The government also asserted two statutory privileges under 50 U.S.C. § 402 note and 50 U.S.C. § 403 -l(i)(l).”
Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Cent. Intelligence Agency Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 911 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “Given the Supreme Court’s sweeping language in Sims and the fact that these exemption statutes were congressionally designed to shield processes at the very core of the intelligence agencies — intelligence-collection and intelligence-source evaluation — we must conclude that the…”
Scott Armstrong, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Exec. Off. of the President, Appellants/cross-Appellees, 90 F.3d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “” National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. §§ 402 (a)-(b). The Council members are the President and certain cabinet-level officials, including the National Security Adviser (NSA) — formally, the' Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.