50 U.S.C. § 833
Repealed. Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XVI, § 1633(b)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2751
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–2013 · leading case: Kaplan v. Conyers, 733 F.3d 1148 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
Kaplan v. Conyers, 733 F.3d 1148 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “CONYERS moval mechanism(s) set out in § 7532 and 50 U.S.C. § 833 13 were discretionary mechanisms in cases involving dismissals for national security reasons.”
John Doe v. Caspar Weinberger, Sec'y, Dep't of Def., 820 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “50 U.S.C. § 833 . Since the government in this case expressly disavows any reliance on the summary termination authority in 50 U.”
Berry v. Conyers, 692 F.3d 1223 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “In that case, the Court determined that the summary re- moval mechanism set out in § 7532, as well as 50 U.S.C. § 833 , 9 were discretionary mechanisms in cases involving dismissals for national security reasons.”
John Doe v. Richard B. Cheney, Sec'y of Dep't of Def., 885 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “” Under 50 U.S.C. § 833 (a), the Secretary of Defense may terminate an NSA employee summarily, without allowing recourse to the procedures of any other statute, if those procedures “cannot be invoked consistently with the national security.”
Carlucci v. Doe, 488 U.S. 93 (1988). “In our view, however, §833 and §7532 are not the exclusive means to remove NSA employees for national security reasons, but instead contemplate alternative recourse to NSA’s ordinary removal mechanisms pursuant to the 1959 NSA Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.