52 U.S.C. § 20310
Definitions
Section was formerly classified to section 1973ff–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: United States v. Vaello Madero, 596 U.S. 159 (2022).
United States v. Vaello Madero, 596 U.S. 159 (2022). “, 52 U. S. C. §20310 (8). In this context, however, Congress did not extend the SSI program to Puerto Rico and other Territories.”
Segovia v. Bd. of Election Commissioners, 201 F. Supp. 3d 924 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (“UOCAVA”), contending that it violates their equal protection and due process rights by barring them from casting absentee ballots in Illinois for…”
United States v. State of Alabama, 778 F.3d 926 (11th Cir. 2015). “” 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (1). It defines "overseas voter” to include: (1) “an absent uniformed services voter who, by reason of active duty or service is absent from the United States on the date' of the election involved”; (2) "a person who resides outside the United States and is…”
Segovia v. Bd. of Election Commissioners, 218 F. Supp. 3d 643 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “52 U.S.C. § 20310 (6). • “United States,” where used in the territorial sense, means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.”
Reeves v. Nago (D. Haw. 2021). “¶ 48 (citing 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (5)). “States” and the territorial use of “United States” include a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.”
Vicente Borja v. Scott Nago, 115 F.4th 971 (9th Cir. 2024). “” 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (5)(C). The Act in turn defines the “United States” to include “the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.”
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Exec. Off. of the President (D.D.C. 2026). “at 30–31 (quoting 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (1), (5)). These arguments fail to persuade.”
Luis Segovia v. United States (7th Cir. 2018). “Federal law says the United States “means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Common‐ wealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Ameri‐ can Samoa[,]” 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (8), while Illinois law says that it includes “the District of Columbia, the…”
United States v. Vaello Madero (2022). “, 52 U. S. C. §20310 (8). In this context, however, Congress did not extend the SSI program to Puerto Rico and other Territories.”
Reeves v. Nago (D. Haw. 2021). “¶ 49 (citing 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (6) & (8)). The Northern Mariana Islands (“NMI”) is excluded from these definitions.”
Reeves v. Nago (D. Haw. 2022). “See 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (5)(B)–(C). “States” and the territorial use of “United States” include a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.”
Vicente Borja v. Scott Nago (9th Cir. 2024). “” 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (5)(C). The Act in turn defines the “United States” to include “the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.”
— 52 U.S.C. § 20310(6) — 1 case
Segovia v. Bd. of Election Commissioners, 201 F. Supp. 3d 924 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, 52 U.S.C. § 20310 (“UOCAVA”), contending that it violates their equal protection and due process rights by barring them from casting absentee ballots in Illinois for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.