Notes of Decisions
Memphis A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Tre Hargett, 2 F.4th 548 (6th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “At most, there is a federal statutory requirement that states allow voters to register by mail, see 52 U.S.C. § 20505 , an obligation that Tennessee has honored, and that by all accounts leaves room for Tennessee to require a voter so registered to vote in person, if the person…”
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 584 U.S. 756 (2018).
“80 , 52 U. S. C. §20505 . In particular, §6(d), entitled “Undeliv- ered Notices,” says that, “[i]f a notice of the disposition of a mail voter registration application .”
Fish v. Kobach, 189 F. Supp. 3d 1107 (D. Kan. 2016).
“52 U.S.C. § 20505 (a)(1). . Id. § 20508(b).”
League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby, 963 F.3d 130 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
“52 U.S.C. § 20505 (a)(1); see id. §§ 20508(a)(2), 20921, 20923(a)(1) (establishing the Election Assistance Commission and assigning to it responsibility over the mail-in form).”
Tenn. State Conf. of the NAACP v. William Lee, 139 F.4th 557 (6th Cir. 2025).
· cites it 2× “52 U.S.C. § 20505 (a)(1)–(2). States must “accept and use” a “mail voter registration application form” that the Election Assistance Commission (or EAC) creates.”
Nearman/Miller v. Rosenblum, 371 P.3d 1186 (Or. 2016).
“To accomplish those objectives, the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is required to develop, in conjunction with the states, a “federal mail voter registration application form.”
Stringer v. Pablos, 274 F. Supp. 3d 588 (W.D. Tex. 2017).
“§ 16-166 (F) with NVRA provision now codified at 52 U.S.C. § 20505 (a)(1) (2012)). In that case, the Court engaged in a textual analysis and found that the limitations imposed by the Arizona statute were incompatible with, and thus preempted by, the NVRA requirements with…”
Promise Arizona v. Petersen, No. 24-4029 (9th Cir. Feb. 25, 2025).
· cites it 17× “Public assistance agencies in Arizona typically use the state form to register individuals to vote.”
52 U.S.C. § 20505(a)(1): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.