6 U.S.C. § 5
NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.
“No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out this Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1928–1960 · leading case: United States v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 25 F.2d 500 (D. Maryland 1928).
United States v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 25 F.2d 500 (D. Maryland 1928). “The question for decision is one of limitations, and turns upon the proper construction to be placed upon section 2 of the Act of August 8, 1888 (6 USCA § 5; 25 Stat. 387 ), or more precisely upon the meaning of the words “statement of the account” as contained in that enactment.”
United States v. Stand. Accident Ins. Co., 280 F.2d 445 (1st Cir. 1960). “” 6 U.S.C. § 5 . (Italics supplied.) It is apparent that although suit was started within five years of the statement of the account by the G.”
United States v. Mercantile Nat. Bank, 67 F. Supp. 759 (W.D. La. 1946). “Code, §§ 275-277—and as to sureties on the bonds of disbursing officers (usually corporate sureties receiving commensurate compensation for the risk of loss involved)—6 U.S.C. § 5, 6 U.S.C.A. § 5 — the committee feel it is fair and reasonable that such policy be extended to…”
United States v. Geise, 56 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1932). “Code, § 5, title 6 [6 USCA § 5]). Geise entered the army service November 7, 1917, giving a bond of the appellee as surety, for the faithful performance of his duties.”
United States v. Taylor, 132 F. Supp. 886 (E.D.N.Y 1955). “The first motion is that of the defendant Royal Indemnity Company for an order directing that summary judgment be *887 entered in favor of that defendant dismissing the complaint on the ground-that by virtue of the provisions of Title 6 U.S.C.A. § 5 , defendant, as surety on the…”
United States v. Arthur, 68 F. Supp. 936 (S.D. Fla. 1946). “The first subsidiary question presented is whether this action is controlled by 6 U.S.C.A. § 5 , the Five Year Statute of Limitations, or Section 3838 of the Revised Statutes, 39 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.