6 U.S.C. § 521
Legal status of EOIR
There is in the Department of Justice the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which shall be subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General under section 1103(g) of title 8.
Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, § 1104, as added by Pub. L. 108–7, div. L, § 105(a)(3),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Ge, 930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019).
Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Ge, 930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019). “5 Although 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a) places the Executive Office of Immigration Review "subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General under [ 8 U.”
Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 971 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 2020). “7 See 6 U.S.C. § 521 (establishing the EOIR); 8 U.”
J-f-f, 23 I. & N. Dec. 912 (BIA 2006). “2135 , 2273 (codified at 6 U.S.C. § 521 (Supp. II 2002)) (providing for direction and regulation by the Attorney General under section 103(g) of the Act, 8 U.”
Kaufman v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1334 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “0 , and "shall be subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General under section 1103 of the [Act]," 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a). The Homeland Security Act amends 8 U.”
United States v. Leon-Gonzalez, 351 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (W.D. Tex. 2018). “As such, Congress has said that the Executive Office of Immigration Review is "subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General," 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a) (2018), including regulations promulgated by the Attorney General.”
Xing Yang v. Eric Holder, Jr., 770 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 2014). “See 6 U.S.C. § 521 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (g). The EOIR encompasses the BIA and a host of immigration judges.”
United States v. Erazo-Diaz, 353 F. Supp. 3d 867 (D. Ariz. 2018). “Pursuant to 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a)(2018), the Executive Office of Immigration Review is "subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General".”
Fortunato Amador Duenas v. Merrick Garland, 78 F.4th 1069 (9th Cir. 2023). “See 6 U.S.C. § 521 . DUENAS V. GARLAND 9 she enjoys the power to appoint them.”
Grewal v. Ashcroft, 301 F. Supp. 2d 692 (N.D. Ohio 2004). “6 U.S.C. § 521 and 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (a). Accordingly, Attorney General John Ashcroft is a proper defendant; U.”
Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2020). “7 See 6 U.S.C. § 521 (establishing the EOIR); 8 U.”
United States v. Moreno-Mendoza, 386 F. Supp. 3d 765 (W.D. Tex. 2019). “As such, Congress has said that the Executive Office of Immigration Review is "subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General," 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a) (2018), including regulations promulgated by the Attorney General.”
United States v. Eligio-Rodriguez, 386 F. Supp. 3d 774 (W.D. Tex. 2019). “As such, Congress has said that the Executive Office of Immigration Review is "subject to the direction and regulation of the Attorney General," 6 U.S.C. § 521 (a) (2018), including regulations promulgated by the Attorney General.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.