In order to aid in diffusing among the people of the United States useful and practical information on subjects relating to agriculture, uses of solar energy with respect to agriculture, home economics, and rural energy, and to encourage the application of the same, there may be continued or inaugurated in connection with the college or colleges in each State, Territory, or possession, now receiving, or which may hereafter receive, the benefits of subchapters I and II of this chapter, agricultural extension work which shall be carried on in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture: Provided, That in any State, Territory, or possession in which two or more such colleges have been or hereafter may be established, the appropriations hereinafter made to such State, Territory, or possession shall be administered by such college or colleges as the legislature of such State, Territory, or possession may direct. For the purposes of this subchapter, the term “solar energy” means energy derived from sources (other than fossil fuels) and technologies included in the Federal Non-Nuclear 11 So in original. Probably should be “Nonnuclear”. Energy Research and Development Act of 1974, as amended [42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
21
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1937–2023 · leading case:
Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986).
Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986).
· cites it 2× “§§ 1981 , 1983 and 2000d, and 7 U. S. C. § 341 et seq. The defendants, respondents here, were William C.”
Wells v. Hutchinson, 499 F. Supp. 174 (E.D. Tex. 1980).
· cites it 3× “372 , 7 U.S.C. § 341 et seq., in which Congress provided for partial federal funding of state agricultural extension services.”
Knight v. State of Ala., 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991).
· cites it 2× “, 7 U.S.C. § 341 et seq., which made available federal funds for cooperative state extension services in the various states.”
Ayers v. Allain, 674 F. Supp. 1523 (N.D. Miss. 1987).
“Cooperative extension began with the Smith-Lever Act of May 8, 1914 ( 7 U.S.C. § 341 , et seq.) and now encompasses four areas: agricultural and national resources programs; home economics or family living; 4-H youth development; and community development.”
United States v. Holdman, 75 F.4th 514 (5th Cir. 2023).
“See 7 U.S.C. § 341 . Holdman’s insistence that the applicable guidance for how he used his land in Louisiana could come from the Mississippi State Extension Service is contrary to the purpose and authority of each state’s extension service.”
B.K. ex rel. Kroupa v. 4-H, 877 F. Supp. 2d 804 (D.S.D. 2012).
“The South Dakota legislature has stated that SDSU, through the Board of Regents, will oversee the 4-H program for South Dakota: The provisions of an act of Congress entitled, “An Act to establish agricultural extension departments in connection with agricultural colleges in the…”
Wade v. Mississippi Coop. Extension Serv., 372 F. Supp. 126 (N.D. Miss. 1974).
“The purpose of cooperative extension work, as set forth in the Smith-Lever Act of May 8, 1914 ( 7 U.S.C. § 341 et seq.), is to aid in “diffusing among the people of the United States useful and practical information on subjects relating to agriculture and home economics, and to…”
Knight v. Alabama, 14 F.3d 1534 (11th Cir. 1994).
“As for extension work, each year Alabama receives approximately $12 million from the federal government pursuant to the Smith-Lever Act, 7 U.S.C. § 341 et seq., to fund agricultural extension services administered by the state’s land grant universities.”
United States v. Kay, 89 F.2d 19 (2d Cir. 1937).
“372 [ 7 U.S.C.A. § 341 et seq.]), for the creation of a bureau of home economics ( 46 Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.