7 U.S.C. § 511
Definitions
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases, 1937–2018 · leading case: Ass'n of Am. Railroads v. U.S. Dep't of Transp., 896 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Ass'n of Am. Railroads v. U.S. Dep't of Transp., 896 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Wallace, the Tobacco Inspection Act of 1935, 7 U.S.C. §§ 511 et seq., delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to set standards for various classes of tobacco that would affect the commodity’s market pricing.”
Campbell v. Hussey, 368 U.S. 297 (1962). “731 , 7 U. S. C. § 511 , and in its declaration of purpose, § 2, 7 U.”
Wallace v. Currin, 95 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1938). “This is an appeal from a decree enjoining officials of the Department of Agriculture and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina from enforcing the provisions of the Tobacco Inspection Act of August 23, 1935, 7 U.S.C.A. § 511 et seq. The appellees,…”
B. B. Rogers v. Douglas Tobacco Bd. of Trade, Inc., 266 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1959). “Coming more specifically to the particular transactions involved in this case, the Tobacco Inspection Act of 1935, 7 U.S.C.A. § 511 et seq., and the decision of the Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of that Act, Currin v.”
Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell, 335 U.S. 377 (1948). “731 , 7 U S. C. § 511 (i); 30 Stat. 544 , as amended, 11 U.”
Walling v. Goldblatt Bros., 128 F.2d 778 (7th Cir. 1942). “731 , 7 U.S. C.A. § 511; Agricultural Marketing Act of 1937, 50 Stat.”
Mitchell v. Block, 551 F. Supp. 1011 (W.D. Va. 1982). “The rules were promulgated under the Tobacco Inspection Act of 1935, 7 U.S.C. § 511 (1976). II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW There are two basic issues before the court at this time.”
Rudolph O. Schneider, Jr. & Steven Vitale v. United States, 459 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1972). “441 (1939) (upholding the Tobacco Inspection Act, 7 U.S.C. § 511 , which provided that in case the Secretary of Agriculture was unable to inspect all market areas, he should inspect those areas where the greatest number of growers could be served, with the result that some…”
Barton v. Bergland, 444 F. Supp. 447 (E.D. Ky. 1978). “However, the defendant, Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter “Secretary”), pursuant to the authority given him in the Tobacco Inspection Act (hereinafter the “Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 511 et seq., has promulgated regulations in 7 C.”
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. United States, 259 F. Supp. 2d 783 (W.D. Wis. 2003). “For example, it affirmed the constitutionality of the Tobacco Inspection Act, 7 U.S.C. § 511 (d), which allowed the Secretary of Agriculture to designate certain tobacco auctions as interstate tobacco markets, contingent on the concurrence of at least two-thirds of the affected…”
Double-Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. State of Texas, 248 F. Supp. 515 (N.D. Tex. 1965). “’ ” No such clear statement of Congressional intent of uniform federal standards is found in the Federal Trade ■Commission Act.”
Lazar v. Benson, 156 F. Supp. 259 (E.D.S.C. 1957). “The grading of tobacco, under the Tobacco Inspection Act ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 511 et seq.), is based entirely on characteristics visible to the naked eye and the presence or absence of flavor and aroma is not a grading factor and cannot be *263 established as a factor in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.