8 U.S.C. § 1

SHORT TITLE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

“This Act may be cited as the ‘Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000’.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1938–2026 · leading case: East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump, 932 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2018).
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump, 932 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2018). “163 (codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.). In 1996, Congress enacted the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.”
Serna, 20 I. & N. Dec. 579 (BIA 1992). · cites it 2× “2 Revised and redesignated as section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1 182(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) (Supp. II 1990), by section 601(a) of the Immigration Act of 1990, 104 Stat.”
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump, 909 F.3d 1219 (9th Cir. 2018). “163 (codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.). In 1996, Congress enacted the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.”
Kirong v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 800 (8th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “However, because the BIA's alternative finding that Kirong was inadmissible based on his failure to prove clearly and beyond doubt that he did not falsely represent himself as a citizen of the United States could result in a permanent bar to entry into the United States, see 8…”
Cristina Galeas Castaneda v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 23 F.3d 1576 (10th Cir. 1994). “That section, in conjunction with the more general jurisdictional provisions in chapter 158 of Title 28, specifically vests authority to review “all final orders of deportation” in the circuit courts of appeal, which have “exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in…”
Dolores Tapia-Martinez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney Gen. of United States, 482 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2007). “Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1 182(a)(6)(A)(i), the INS commenced re *419 moval proceedings against petitioner by-filing a Notice to Appear in November 1999, alleging that petitioner was an alien living in the United States without being admitted or paroled.”
United States v. Winston C. Graham A/K/A Vincent Graham, A/K/A Michael Diamond A/K/A Tyrone L. Simmons, Winston C. Graham, 169 F.3d 787 (3rd Cir. 1999). “See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1 Revisor’s Note, at 50 (1969).”
Felix Gonzalez Gisbert v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 988 F.2d 1437 (5th Cir. 1993). “8 U.S.C. § 1 182(d)(5)(A) provides that "[t]he Attorney General may in his discretion parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as he may prescribe for emergent reasons or for reasons deemed strictly in the public interest any alien applying for admission…”
Renteria-Gonzalez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 322 F.3d 804 (5th Cir. 2002). “14 BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge, Specially Concurring: Although I would reach the same result as the majority in the case at bar, I write separately because section II(B)(1)(b) of the majority opinion paints with too broad a brush with respect to whether a vacated conviction falls…”
Serrato-Soto v. Holder, 570 F.3d 686 (6th Cir. 2009). “” 8 U.S.C. § 1 182(a)(2)(A)®©; INA § 212(a)(2)(A)®.”
Giuseppe Spina v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 470 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2006). “As for our statutory jurisdiction, although 8 U.S.C. § 1 105a(c) had provided that “an order of deportation .”
Madrane v. Hogan, 520 F. Supp. 2d 654 (M.D. Penn. 2007). “Petitioner asserted that he readily met the first and third requirements, but his conviction and sentence rendered him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1 182(a)(2)(A)(i) (crime of moral turpitude).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.