8 U.S.C. § 101
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 70
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1927–2026 · leading case: Hechavarria v. Sessions, 891 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 2018).
Hechavarria v. Sessions, 891 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 2018). “§ 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), because of his conviction for a crime USCIS characterized as a "crime of violence" pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(43)(F). 7 *57 The government argues that Section 1226 governs only the detention of aliens before a removal order is issued.”
Okey Okpala v. Matthew Whitaker, 908 F.3d 965 (5th Cir. 2018). “8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(43). It does not alter the Court's interpretation of 8 U.”
McGrath v. Kristensen, 340 U.S. 162 (1950). “874 , *164 889, 8 U. S. C. §§ 101 , 155 (c), on the sole ground that the alien was ineligible for naturalization.”
Rafael Hernandez-Mancilla v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 246 F.3d 1002 (7th Cir. 2001). “” 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(43). The question then is whether any of Hernandez-Maneilla’s offenses may be classified as an “aggravated felony,” a jurisdictional question we review de novo.”
Jose F. Guerrero-Perez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., & John Ashcroft, 242 F.3d 727 (7th Cir. 2001). “Consequently, Solorzano-Patlan’s burglarizing a vehicle did not involve a building or structure and so could not fall within the meaning of burglary offense as provided for in 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(43)(G). To illustrate the need for uniformity in defining the term “burglary,” we…”
John Doe & Jane Doe v. Brady Smith, Dianne Shepard, Kathryn Fletcher, 470 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2006). “Gonzales was a review of a removal decision under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. While we held that the petitioner’s prior conviction for solicitation constituted “sexual abuse,” that decision was made in an immigration case under 8 U.”
Gaya Prasad v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 101 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 1996). “To qualify for asylum, an alien must show he or she is a refugee as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(42). This is established by evidence of past persecution, or by evidence that the alien has a well-founded fear of future persecution, on account of race, religion, nationality,…”
Louisiana Forestry Ass'n Inc. v. Sec'y United States Dep't of Labor, 745 F.3d 653 (3rd Cir. 2014). “See 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(15)(H)(ii)(b); 2008 Wage Rule, 73 Fed.”
Am. Immigr. Lawyers Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2012). “The USCIS carries out this function pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(15)(H)(i)(b), which provides for the admission into the United States of temporary workers to perform services in a specialty occupation.”
Corpeno-Romero v. Garland, 120 F.4th 570 (9th Cir. 2024). “” 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(42)(A); 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A).”
Andrianova v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 799 N.E.2d 5 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). “The Court noted that § 101(a)(13) came about as a result of court decisions concerning resident aliens returning to the United States following brief trips abroad and then facing deportation proceedings.”
John DOE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Immigr. & NATURALIZATION Serv., Respondent-Appellant, 120 F.3d 200 (9th Cir. 1997). “Doe were ordered removed and denied all other forms of available relief, the DEA would request that the Attorney General grant Doe an “S” Visa under 8 U.S.C. § 101 (a)(15)(S)(i), which would permit Doe to remain for up to three years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.