U.S. Code » Title 8 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— REFUGEE ASSISTANCE

8 U.S.C. § 102

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) There are authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 1981, 1982, and 1983, but only in a lump sum for all programs under this Act, subject to allocation in accordance with subsection (b), such sums as may be necessary to make payments to which State educational agencies are entitled under this Act and payments for administration under section 104.“(b)(1) If the sums appropriated for any fiscal year to make payments to States under this Act are not sufficient to pay in full the sum of the amounts which State educational agencies are entitled to receive under titles II through IV for such year, the allocations to State educational agencies under each of such titles shall be ratably reduced by the same percentage to the extent necessary to bring the aggregate of such allocations within the limits of the amounts so appropriated.“(2) In the event that funds become available for making payments under this Act for any period after allocations have been made under paragraph (1) of this subsection for such period, the amounts reduced under such paragraph shall be increased on the same basis as they were reduced.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1927–1956 · leading case: United States v. Roberto Flores-Rodriguez, 237 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Roberto Flores-Rodriguez, 237 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1956). “§ 1103 provides for the assignment of medical officers of the United States Public Health Service for the performance of duties in foreign countries in connection with the enforcement of the immigration laws. The court is informed the medical officers have been assigned to…”
Lazarescu v. United States, 199 F.2d 898 (4th Cir. 1952). “See, also, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 102 , 180(a), 180(c), 181. Manifestly the Immigration Inspector had here no authority to admit the appellant to the United States.”
Ferrer v. Fronton Exhibition Co., 188 F.2d 954 (5th Cir. 1951). “8 U.S.C.A. §§ 102 , 103, 131. The statute is designed to prohibit, not the mere injury to an individual which might result from the prohibited acts, but the harm to the general public which would be occasioned by the evils against which -the statute is directed.”
Indem. Ins. Co. of North Am. v. United States, 74 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1934). “8 US CA § 102 provides that the Commissioner General of Immigration, under the direction of the Secretary of Labor, shall have charge of the administration of all laws relating to the immigration of aliens into the United *25 States, shall have control, direction, and…”
Brownlow v. Miers, 28 F.2d 653 (5th Cir. 1928). “• * Section 23 (8 USCA §§ 102, 108) defines the power of the Commissioner General of Immigration, as follows: “That the Commissioner General of Immigration shall perform all his duties under the direction of the Secretary of Labor.”
Bonham v. Chi Yan Cham Louie, 166 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1948). “8 U.S.C. § 102 , 8 U.S.C. A. § 102. We assume that he has the authority to delegate to a district director such administrative power.”
Miers v. Brownlow, 21 F.2d 376 (S.D. Ala. 1927). “129 (8 USCA § 102). Such rules cannot go beyond the powers delegated by the statute.”
United States v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line, 84 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1936). “8 U.S.C.A. § 102 . Under that authority he has established a rule that alien through passengers on vessels touching at ports of the United States may land temporarily from the vessel, for the limited time she is in port, without a vised passport, if the examining immigration…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.