U.S. Code » Title 8 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION › Part Part II— Nationality Through Naturalization

8 U.S.C. § 2

EXEMPTION FROM ENGLISH LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN ALIENS WHO SERVED WITH SPECIAL GUERRILLA UNITS OR IRREGULAR FORCES IN LAOS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar
“The requirement of paragraph (1) of section 312(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1423(a)(1)) shall not apply to the naturalization of any person—“(1) who—“(A) was admitted into the United States as a refugee from Laos pursuant to section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157); and“(B) served with a special guerrilla unit, or irregular forces, operating from a base in Laos in support of the United States military at any time during the period beginning February 28, 1961, and ending September 18, 1978;“(2) who—“(A) satisfies the requirement of paragraph (1)(A); and“(B) was the spouse of a person described in paragraph (1) on the day on which such described person applied for admission into the United States as a refugee; or“(3) who—“(A) satisfies the requirement of paragraph (1)(A); and“(B) is the surviving spouse of a person described in paragraph (1)(B) which described person was killed or died in Laos, Thailand, or Vietnam.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1989–2023 · leading case: United States v. Jeross, 521 F.3d 562 (6th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Jeross, 521 F.3d 562 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 841 (a)(1) (possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance), 8 U.S.C. § 2 (aiding and abetting), and 31 U.”
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006). “The Government has argued that Defendants are liable for CTR and TI's racketeering acts as aiders and abettors underl8 U.S.C. § 2(a) ("[wjhoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as…”
United States v. Julio Estrada, 969 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2020). “See 8 U.S.C. § 2 ; Dominguez, 661 F.3d at 1065 .”
McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland, 64 F.4th 1025 (9th Cir. 2023). “In Part III, Judge Collins noted that, in concluding that Washington aiding and abetting law matches its federal analog, the majority made several statements about the scope of federal aiding and abetting law under 8 U.S.C. § 2 that are contrary to well- settled authority.”
Sims v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins., 336 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (S.D. Fla. 2004). “’ 8 U.S.C. § 2 . ‘We see nothing in the Act indicating that the broad principles of enforceability is [sic] subject to any additional limitations under state law.”
Apolinar Hernandez-Garza v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 882 F.2d 945 (5th Cir. 1989). “§ 1325 (a) 1 and 8 U.S.C. § 2 . 2 In due course deportation proceedings were commenced pursuant to INA section 241(a)(13), 8 U.”
United States v. Reyes-Bosque, 463 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (S.D. Cal. 2006). “§ 1324 (a)(2)(B)® and aiding and abetting in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 2 ; and *1141 “harboring illegal aliens” in violation of 8 U.”
United States v. Jason Aguilera, 655 F. App'x 213 (5th Cir. 2016). “PER CURIAM: * Jason Aguilera pleaded guilty of aiding and abetting possession with intent to dis *215 tribute one kilogram or more of heroin in violation of Í8 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(i).”
United States v. Marshall, 120 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2005). “§§ 841 (a)(1), 846, 8 U.S.C. § 2 . The facts, contained in documents which remain under seal, are known to the parties.”
Samba Eric Kamara v. Attorney Gen. United States (3rd Cir. 2018). “§ 1344 and 8 U.S.C. § 2 . 2 Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(M), an aggravated felony includes an offense that involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000.”
United States v. Angelica Whiteman (9th Cir. 2021). “8 U.S.C. § 2 (a person 4 who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures” commission of federal offense is punishable as a principal); Rosemond v.”
United States v. Rego-Plasencia (5th Cir. 2023). “See 8 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1324. She was sentenced to a below-Guidelines range of 40-months’ imprisonment.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— 8 U.S.C. § 2(a) — 1 case
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006). “The Government has argued that Defendants are liable for CTR and TI's racketeering acts as aiders and abettors underl8 U.S.C. § 2(a) ("[wjhoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.