9 U.S.C. § 13
Papers filed with order on motions; judgment; docketing; force and effect; enforcement
The judgment shall be docketed as if it was rendered in an action.
The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action; and it may be enforced as if it had been rendered in an action in the court in which it is entered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 206
cases (91 in the last 5 years), 1959–2026 · leading case: AIG Baker Sterling Heights, LLC v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc., 579 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2009).
AIG Baker Sterling Heights, LLC v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc., 579 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2009). “That provision says that a judgment confirming an arbitration award, once entered, has the same force and effect as a judgment in a standard civil action and is subject to all the provisions of law relating to those judgments.”
In Re Marriage of Franke v. Franke, 2004 WI 8 (Wis. 2004). “[26] Section 13 of Title 9 provides in part: "The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action; and it may be enforced as if it had been rendered in an action in…”
Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. App. 2005). “See 9 U.S.C.S. § 13 (“The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect .”
Volanda Woods v. Pam Transp. Inc-Lu, 440 F. App'x 265 (5th Cir. 2011). “Woods first argues that the district court had the authority to correct the arbitrator’s alleged error under 9 U.S.C. § 13 , which provides that a judgment affirming, modifying, or correcting an arbitration award has “the same force and effect” as, and is “subject to all the…”
Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., 124 S.W.3d 883 (Tex. App. 2004). “” 9 U.S.C. § 13 (1982); see also Tanox, Inc.”
Ntch-Wa, Inc. v. Zte Corp., 921 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2019). “A federal-court order confirming an arbitration award has “the same force and effect” as a final judgment on the merits, 9 U.S.C. § 13 , including the same preclusive effect.”
In Re Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, 252 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. 2008). “” 9 U.S.C. § 13 (1999) (emphasis added). The Texas Act contains a substantially similar provision.”
Apparel Art Int'l, Inc. v. Amertex Enter. Ltd., 48 F.3d 576 (1st Cir. 1995). “” 9 U.S.C. § 13 (1988). Therefore, when a federal district court enters a judgment confirming an arbitration award pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, that judgment has res judicata effect as to all matters adjudicated by the arbitrators and embodied in their award.”
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Gov't of the Lao People's Democratic Repub., 864 F.3d 172 (2d Cir. 2017). “” 9 U.S.C. § 13 . The “provisions of law. relating to[ ] a judgment in an action” include the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
W. Dow Hamm III Corp. v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 237 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App. 2007). “See 9 U.S.C. § 13 (1997) (providing that judgment confirming arbitration award has same force and effect as court judgment); Tex.”
Teamsters Local 177 v. United Parcel Serv., 966 F.3d 245 (3rd Cir. 2020). “See 9 U.S.C. § 13 . The FAA not only authorizes, but mandates, that district courts confirm arbitration awards by converting them into enforceable judgments through a summary proceeding.”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WMR E-Pin, LLC, 653 F.3d 702 (8th Cir. 2011). “Appellants locate their right to seek Rule 60(b)(5) relief in 9 U.S.C. § 13 , which provides that a judgment confirming an arbitration award "shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an…”
— 9 U.S.C. § 13(a) — 1 case
UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. v. Harrison (D. Ariz. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.