9 U.S.C. § 303
Order to compel arbitration; appointment of arbitrators; locale
Section effective upon the entry into force of the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior Court, 949 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1998).
Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior Court, 949 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1998). “( 9 U.S.C. § 303 (b); Inter-Am. Convention on International Com.”
Productos Mercantiles E Industriales, S.A. v. Faberge USA, Inc., 23 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 1994). “9 U.S.C. § 303 (Supp. IV 1992). Appellants contend that Bergesen is inap-posite, since it involved a different treaty.”
Am. Life Ins. v. Parra, 269 F. Supp. 2d 519 (D. Del. 2003). “A § 301; 9 U.S.C.A. §§ 303 (b), 306. Further, the parties’ arbitration agreements provide that “any dispute arising between the parties in connection therewith shall be governed exclusively by the law of the State of Delaware, United States of America.”
The branch of Citibank, N.A. established in the Repub. of Argentina v. De Nevares (S.D.N.Y. 2022). “, in particular 9 U.S.C. § 303 . “An arbitration agreement .”
Prime Venture Corp. v. Fennix Global Holdings, Inc. (D.P.R. 2020). “” 9 U.S.C. § 303 (a) (emphasis added). The First Circuit has repeatedly stated that “[c]ourts may not rewrite the parties' agreements and compel arbitration of their dispute in a forum which is not one of those enumerated in an arbitration agreement's forum selection clause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.