Utah Code
Utah Code § 13-24-8 (2026)
Effect on other law
✓ laws through the 2026 General Session (checked Sept. 2026)
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as provided in Subsection (2), this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and other law of this state providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.
This chapter does not affect:
contractual remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret;
other civil remedies that are not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret; or
criminal remedies, whether or not based upon misappropriation of a trade secret.
Enacted by Chapter 60, 1989 General Session
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: CDC Restoration & Constr., LC v. Tradesmen Contractors, LLC, 2012 UT App 60, 274 P.3d 317.
CDC Restoration & Constr., LC v. Tradesmen Contractors, LLC, 2012 UT App 60, 274 P.3d 317. “Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-8 (2009). 38 This appeal asks whether CDC's non-UTSA remedies are "based upon misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Innosys, Inc. v. Mercer, 2015 UT 80, 364 P.3d 1013. “¶96 The UTSA explicitly states that ―this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and other law of this state provid- ing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret,‖ UTAH CODE § 13-24-8(1), unless the remedy sought is contractual, a civil remedy that is…”
Retiree, Inc. v. Anspach, 95 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (D. Kan. 2015). “” Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-8 (1). Finally, the Appellants’ post-trial contemptuous conduct clearly supports the unlimited duration of the district court’s injunction.”
Premier Sleep Solutions v. Sound Sleep Med., No. 2:20-cv-00062 (D. Utah Mar. 30, 2021). “UTAH CODE § 13-24-8. In interpreting the scope of the UTSA preemption provision, the Utah Court of Appeals held that “a claim is preempted to the extent that it is based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information.”
Total Quality Sys. v. Universal Synaptics, 679 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (D. Utah 2023). “simultaneously establish a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, it is preempted irrespective [of] whatever surplus elements of proof were necessary to establish it.”
Convoyant LLC v. Deepthink LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00310, 2021 WL 5810638 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 7, 2021). “900(1); Utah Code § 13-24-8. It does not, however, 11 displace “[c]ontractual or other civil liability or relief that is not based upon 12 misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Convoyant LLC v. Deepthink LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00310, 2022 WL 36726 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2022). “900(1); Utah Code § 13-24-8. The UTSA does not, 7 however, displace “[c]ontractual or other civil liability or relief that is not based upon 8 misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Complete Merch. Solutions v. Davis, No. 2:24-cv-00789 (D. Utah Dec. 10, 2024). “”27 The court agrees Nexio’s UTSA claim preempts its claims for Tortious Interference and Aiding and Abetting Breach of the Duty of Loyalty because the factual allegations underlying these claims would simultaneously establish a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets.”
Pascal Metrics, Inc. v. Health Catalyst, Inc., No. N22C-01-175 MMJ CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. June 15, 2022). “21 Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-8 (2)(a). 9 Pascal relies on CDC Restoration & Construction, LC v.”
Graystone Funding v. Network Funding, No. 2:19-cv-00383 (D. Utah Sept. 29, 2021). “UTAH CODE § 13-24-8. In interpreting the scope of the UTSA’s preemption provision, the Utah Court of Appeals held that “a claim is preempted to the extent that it is based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information.”
Utah Code § 13-24-8(1): 2 cases
Innosys, Inc. v. Mercer, 2015 UT 80, 364 P.3d 1013. “¶96 The UTSA explicitly states that ―this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and other law of this state provid- ing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret,‖ UTAH CODE § 13-24-8(1), unless the remedy sought is contractual, a civil remedy that is…”
Total Quality Sys. v. Universal Synaptics, 679 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (D. Utah 2023). “simultaneously establish a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, it is preempted irrespective [of] whatever surplus elements of proof were necessary to establish it.”
Utah Code § 13-24-8(2): 1 case
Innosys, Inc. v. Mercer, 2015 UT 80, 364 P.3d 1013. “¶96 The UTSA explicitly states that ―this chapter displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and other law of this state provid- ing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret,‖ UTAH CODE § 13-24-8(1), unless the remedy sought is contractual, a civil remedy that is…”
Utah Code § 13-24-8(2)(b): 2 cases
Premier Sleep Solutions v. Sound Sleep Med., No. 2:20-cv-00062 (D. Utah Mar. 30, 2021). “UTAH CODE § 13-24-8. In interpreting the scope of the UTSA preemption provision, the Utah Court of Appeals held that “a claim is preempted to the extent that it is based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information.”
Total Quality Sys. v. Universal Synaptics, 679 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (D. Utah 2023). “simultaneously establish a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, it is preempted irrespective [of] whatever surplus elements of proof were necessary to establish it.”
Utah Code § 13-24-8(b): 1 case
Premier Sleep Solutions v. Sound Sleep Med., No. 2:20-cv-00062 (D. Utah Mar. 30, 2021). “UTAH CODE § 13-24-8. In interpreting the scope of the UTSA preemption provision, the Utah Court of Appeals held that “a claim is preempted to the extent that it is based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.