Utah Code
Utah Code § 17B-2a-1002 (2026)
Purpose of water conservancy districts
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the policy of the state to:
provide for the conservation and development of the water and land resources of the state;
provide for the greatest beneficial use of water within the state;
control and make use of all unappropriated waters in the state and to apply those waters to direct and supplemental beneficial uses including domestic, manufacturing, irrigation, and power;
obtain from water in the state the highest duty for domestic uses and irrigation of lands in the state within the terms of applicable interstate compacts and other law;
cooperate with the United States and its agencies under federal reclamation or other laws and to construct, finance, operate, and maintain works in the state; and
promote the greater prosperity and general welfare of the people of the state by encouraging the organization of water conservancy districts.
The creation and operation of water conservancy districts are a public use to help accomplish the policy stated in Subsection (1) and will:
be essentially for the benefit and advantage of the people of the state;
indirectly benefit all industries of the state;
indirectly benefit the state by increasing the value of taxable property in the state;
directly benefit municipalities by providing adequate supplies of water for domestic use;
directly benefit lands to be irrigated or drained;
directly benefit lands now under irrigation by stabilizing the flow of water in streams and by increasing flow and return flow of water to those streams; and
promote the comfort, safety, and welfare of the people of the state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case: Jenkins v. Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist., 2012 UT App 204 (Utah Ct. App. 2012).
Jenkins v. Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist., 2012 UT App 204 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). “See Utah Code Ann. § 17B-2a-1002 (2009). Acknowledging the need for the conservation and beneficial use of this limited resource, the Utah Legislature has adopted a "statutory framework [that] evinces a state policy of displacing competition with regulation in the area of…”
Huber (D. Utah 2026). “§ 17B-2a-1002. collectively referred to as “Defendants”).”
Utah Code § 17B-2a-1002(1): 1 case
Jenkins v. Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist., 2012 UT App 204 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). “See Utah Code Ann. § 17B-2a-1002 (2009). Acknowledging the need for the conservation and beneficial use of this limited resource, the Utah Legislature has adopted a "statutory framework [that] evinces a state policy of displacing competition with regulation in the area of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.