Utah Code
Utah Code § 20A-1-103 (2026)
Severability clause
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If any provision of
Laws of Utah 2014, Chapter 17
, or the application of any provision of
Laws of Utah 2014, Chapter 17
, to any person or circumstance is held invalid by a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of
Laws of Utah 2014, Chapter 17
, shall be given effect without the invalid provision or application. The provisions of
Laws of Utah 2014, Chapter 17
, are severable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2015–2018 · leading case: Utah Repub. Party v. Cox, 892 F.3d 1066 (10th Cir. 2018).
Utah Repub. Party v. Cox, 892 F.3d 1066 (10th Cir. 2018). “29 We pause briefly to note that SB54’s severability clause would likely preclude us from striking down the entire law even were we to rule in favor of the URP on this issue, see Utah Code § 20A-1-103, but we nonetheless consider this argument in the alternative, and ultimately…”
Utah Repub. Party v. Cox, 885 F.3d 1219 (10th Cir. 2018). “We pause briefly to note that SB54’s severability clause would likely preclude us from striking down the entire law even were we to rule in favor of the URP on this issue, see Utah Code § 20A-1-103, but we nonetheless consider this argument in the alternative, and ultimately…”
Utah Repub. Party v. Herbert, 144 F. Supp. 3d 1263 (D. Utah 2015). “Utah Code § 20A-1-103. . Utah Code § 20A-9-406(l)(a).”
Utah Repub. Party v. Herbert, 133 F. Supp. 3d 1337 (D. Utah 2015). “SB54 also enacts new sections 20A-1-103 and 20A-9-405 through 410.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.