Utah Code » Title 25, Chapter 6 — Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; part 25-6-3 — Transfers and Remedies
Utah Code

Utah Code § 25-6-303 (2026)

Remedies of creditors

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under this chapter, a creditor, subject to the limitations in Section 25-6-304, may obtain:
avoidance of the transfer or obligation to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor's claim;
an attachment or other provisional remedy against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee if available under applicable law;
subject to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with applicable rules of civil procedure:
an injunction against further disposition by the debtor or a transferee, or both, of the asset transferred or of other property;
appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee; or
any other relief the circumstances may require.
If a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 2019–2026 · leading case: Eskelsen v. Theta Inv. Co., 2019 UT App 1 (Utah Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eskelsen v. Theta Inv. Co., 2019 UT App 1 (Utah Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “" See Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-303 (LexisNexis 2013).”
United States v. Peck, 139 F.4th 1158 (10th Cir. 2025). “” Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-303 (2) (West 2025).”
LuMee LLC v. Fernandez (Bankr. D. Utah 2023). · cites it 3× “§ 25:2-29 and Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-303 , which relate to avoidance of the alleged transfers, attachment or injunctive relief; (8) disallowance of claims; (9) seeking to amend the POT Judgment to include Monster as the alter ego of Mr.”
Hafen v. Taylor (D. Utah 2021). · cites it 2× “The Receiver’s claims are brought pursuant to the Utah Act, which provides: (2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), the following rules apply: (b) the judgment may be…”
Klein v. Shepard (D. Utah 2022). · cites it 2× “”166 “A transferee who reasonably should have known of a debtor’s insolvency or of the fraudulent intent underlying the transfer is not entitled to a finding of good faith.”167 The Undisputed Material Facts include facts that highly suggest Defendant should have known of, or at…”
Hafen v. Haddock (D. Utah 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Hafen v. Nichols (D. Utah 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Jonathan O. Hafen, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver v. Terri Andreini (D. Utah 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Hafen (D. Utah 2026). · cites it 2× “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred ….”
Lex Vest LTD v. Glenn R. Bronson, Esq., Receiver for Emanations Commc'ns Grp. LC (D. Nev. 2023). “Pursuant to Rule 66 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and Utah Code § 25-6-303(1)(c)(ii), a remedy provision of Utah’s Voidable Transactions Act (the “UVTA”), Glenn R.”
Hafen v. Famulary (D. Utah 2021). “§ 25-6-303(1)(a); see also id. § 25-6- 304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25- 6-303(1)(a), .”
Hafen v. Brimley (D. Utah 2021). “§ 25-6-303(1)(a); see also id. § 25-6- 304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25- 6-303(1)(a), .”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Utah Code § 25-6-303(1)(a): 9 cases
Hafen v. Taylor (D. Utah 2021). “The Receiver’s claims are brought pursuant to the Utah Act, which provides: (2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), the following rules apply: (b) the judgment may be…”
Hafen v. Haddock (D. Utah 2025). “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Hafen v. Nichols (D. Utah 2025). “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Jonathan O. Hafen, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver v. Terri Andreini (D. Utah 2025). “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred.”
Hafen (D. Utah 2026). “§ 25-6-304(2)(a) (“[T]o the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under Subsection 25-6-303(1)(a), … the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred ….”
Utah Code § 25-6-303(1)(c)(ii): 1 case
Lex Vest LTD v. Glenn R. Bronson, Esq., Receiver for Emanations Commc'ns Grp. LC (D. Nev. 2023). “Pursuant to Rule 66 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and Utah Code § 25-6-303(1)(c)(ii), a remedy provision of Utah’s Voidable Transactions Act (the “UVTA”), Glenn R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.