Utah Code » Title 61, Chapter 2f — Real Estate Licensing and Practices Act; part 61-2f-3 — Operational Requirements
Utah Code

Utah Code § 61-2f-305 (2026)

Restrictions on commissions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as provided in Subsection (2), an associate broker or sales agent may not accept valuable consideration for the performance of an act specified in this chapter from a person except the principal broker with whom the associate broker or sales agent is affiliated.
An associate broker or sales agent may receive valuable consideration for the performance of an act specified in this chapter from a person other than the principal broker with whom the associate broker or sales agent is affiliated if:
the valuable consideration is paid with a payment instrument prepared by a title insurance agent; and
the title insurance agent complies with the written instructions of the principal broker:
in preparing the payment instrument; and
delivering the payment instrument to the associate broker or sales agent.
The commission, with the concurrence of the division, may make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act:
defining what constitutes a "payment instrument" for purposes of this section; or
the form and contents of the written instructions required by Subsection (2), including providing that the contents of the written instructions indicate that the payment instrument process is an assignment to the associate broker or sales agent by the principal broker of a portion of the consideration the title insurance agent is obligated to pay the principal broker.

Amended by Chapter 141, 2023 General Session

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Compton v. Houston Cas. Co., 2017 UT 17, 393 P.3d 305.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Compton v. Houston Cas. Co., 2017 UT 17, 393 P.3d 305. · cites it 4× “See Utah Code § 61-2f-305(l) (2016) (“[A]n associate broker or sales agent may not accept valuable consideration for the performance of an act specified in this chapter from a person except the principal broker with whom the associate broker or sales agent is affiliated.”
Utah Code § 61-2f-305(l): 1 case
Compton v. Houston Cas. Co., 2017 UT 17, 393 P.3d 305. “See Utah Code § 61-2f-305(l) (2016) (“[A]n associate broker or sales agent may not accept valuable consideration for the performance of an act specified in this chapter from a person except the principal broker with whom the associate broker or sales agent is affiliated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.