Utah Code

Utah Code § 70A-3-205 (2026)

Special indorsement -- Blank indorsement -- Anomalous indorsement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If an indorsement is made by the holder of an instrument, whether payable to an identified person or payable to bearer, and the indorsement identifies a person to whom it makes the instrument payable, it is a "special indorsement." When specially indorsed, an instrument becomes payable to the identified person and may be negotiated only by the indorsement of that person. The principles stated in Section 70A-3-110 apply to special indorsements.
If an indorsement is made by the holder of an instrument and it is not a special indorsement, it is a "blank indorsement." When indorsed in blank, an instrument becomes payable to bearer and may be negotiated by transfer of possession alone until specially indorsed.
The holder may convert a blank indorsement that consists only of a signature into a special indorsement by writing, above the signature of the indorser, words identifying the person to whom the instrument is made payable.
"Anomalous indorsement" means an indorsement made by a person who is not the holder of the instrument. An anomalous indorsement does not affect the manner in which the instrument may be negotiated.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Sterling Fiduciaries LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, 2017 UT App 135 (Utah Ct. App. 2017).
Sterling Fiduciaries LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, 2017 UT App 135 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “” It further asserts that “[e]ven if the underlying chain-of-title was relevant, the undisputed evidence establishes that Chase has valid title to both the Note and Trust Deed.” We agree with Chase.”
Utah Code § 70A-3-205(2): 1 case
Sterling Fiduciaries LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, 2017 UT App 135 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). “” It further asserts that “[e]ven if the underlying chain-of-title was relevant, the undisputed evidence establishes that Chase has valid title to both the Note and Trust Deed.” We agree with Chase.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.