Utah Code
Utah Code § 70A-9a-623 (2026)
Right to redeem collateral
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A debtor, any secondary obligor, or any other secured party or lienholder may redeem collateral.
To redeem collateral, a person shall tender:
fulfillment of all obligations secured by the collateral; and
the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees described in Subsection 70A-9a-615(1)(a).
A redemption may occur at any time before a secured party:
has collected collateral under Section 70A-9a-607;
has disposed of collateral or entered into a contract for its disposition under Section 70A-9a-610; or
has accepted collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the obligation it secures under Section 70A-9a-622.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Cascade Collections v. Corray, 2025 UT App 9 (Utah Ct. App. 2025).
Cascade Collections v. Corray, 2025 UT App 9 (Utah Ct. App. 2025). “§ 70A-9a-623. In context, the whole point of requiring creditors to give a date “after which” collateral will be sold at a private sale—one at which debtors cannot appear and bid—is to let the debtors know how much time remains before possible disposition so that they can…”
Utah Code § 70A-9a-623(1): 1 case
Cascade Collections v. Corray, 2025 UT App 9 (Utah Ct. App. 2025). “§ 70A-9a-623. In context, the whole point of requiring creditors to give a date “after which” collateral will be sold at a private sale—one at which debtors cannot appear and bid—is to let the debtors know how much time remains before possible disposition so that they can…”
Utah Code § 70A-9a-623(3)(b): 1 case
Cascade Collections v. Corray, 2025 UT App 9 (Utah Ct. App. 2025). “§ 70A-9a-623. In context, the whole point of requiring creditors to give a date “after which” collateral will be sold at a private sale—one at which debtors cannot appear and bid—is to let the debtors know how much time remains before possible disposition so that they can…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.