Utah Code

Utah Code § 73-3-3 (2026)

Changes to a water right

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this section:
"Agricultural water optimization project" means a project that:
accomplishes agricultural water optimization as defined in Section 73-10g-203.5; and
generates saved water.
"Change" means a change to the:
point of diversion;
place of use;
period of use;
nature of use; or
storage of water.
"Fixed time change" means a change for a fixed period of time exceeding one year and not exceeding 10 years, including a fixed time change described in Section 73-3-30.
"Net decrease in depletion" means a net decrease in water consumed that is accomplished by implementing an agricultural water optimization project under a perfected water right.
"Net reduction in diversion" means a net decrease in water diverted under a perfected water right that is accomplished by implementing an agricultural water optimization project.
"Permanent change" means a change, for an indefinite period of time, including a permanent change described in Section 73-3-30.
"Person entitled to the use of water" means:
the holder of an approved but unperfected application to appropriate water;
the record owner of a perfected water right;
a person who has written authorization from a person described in Subsection (1)(g)(i) or (ii) to file a change application on that person's behalf; or
a shareholder in a water company who is authorized to file a change application in accordance with Section 73-3-3.5.
"Quantity impairment" means any reduction in the amount of water a person is able to receive in order to satisfy an existing right to the use of water that would result from an action proposed in a change application, including:
diminishing the quantity of water in the source of supply for the existing right;
a change in the timing of availability of water from the source of supply for the existing right; or
enlarging the quantity of water depleted by the nature of the proposed use when compared with the nature of the currently approved use.
"Quantity impairment" does not mean a decrease in the static level of water in an underground basin or aquifer that would result from an action proposed to be taken in a change application, if the volume of water necessary to satisfy an existing right otherwise remains reasonably available.
"Saved water" means:
the net decrease in depletion or net reduction in diversion resulting from an agricultural water optimization project as quantified by the state engineer in a final order approving a change application filed under this section:
on a perfected water right;
issued before the commencement of physical construction of the agricultural water optimization project; and
describing the agricultural water optimization project and, as applicable, the net decrease in depletion and net reduction in diversion; or
as applicable, the net decrease in depletion and net reduction in diversion recognized in a certificate issued by the state engineer according to Section 73-3-17 after an applicant has filed proof of appropriation on an approved change application described in Subsection (3)(d).
"Split season change" means a change when the holder of a perfected right grants to a water user the right to make sequential use of a portion of the water right.
"Temporary change" means a change for a period of time, not exceeding one year, including a temporary change described in Section 73-3-30.
A person who proposes to file a change application may request consultation with the state engineer, or the state engineer's designee, before filing the application to review the requirements of the change application process, discuss potential issues related to the change, and provide the applicant with information.
Statements made and information presented in the consultation are not binding on the applicant or the state engineer.
The consultation described in Subsection (2)(a) may occur in the state engineer's regional office for the region where the proposed change would occur.
A person entitled to the use of water may make a change to an existing right to use water, including a right involved in a general determination of rights or other suit, if:
the person makes the change in accordance with this section;
except as provided by Section 73-3-30, the change does not impair an existing right without just compensation or adequate mitigation; and
the state engineer approves the change application, consistent with Section 73-3-8.
A change application on a federal reclamation project water right shall be signed by:
the local water users organization that is contractually responsible for:
the operation and maintenance of the project; or
the repayment of project costs; and
the record owner of the water right.
A change application on a United States Indian Irrigation Service water right that is serving the needs of a township or municipality shall be signed by:
the local public water supplier that is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the public water supply system; and
the record owner of the water right.
A person entitled to the use of water may file a change application on a perfected water right to request the state engineer to:
quantify saved water; or
subject to Section 73-3-8, allow beneficial use of saved water separate from the underlying water right that serves as the basis of the saved water.
Before making a change, a person entitled to the use of water shall submit a change application upon forms furnished by the state engineer.
The application described in Subsection (4)(a) shall include:
the applicant's name;
the water right description, including the water right number;
the water quantity;
the stream or water source;
if applicable, the point on the stream or water source where the water is diverted;
if applicable, the point to which it is proposed to change the diversion of the water;
the place, nature, period, and extent of the currently approved use;
the place, nature, period, and extent of the proposed use;
if the change applicant is submitting a change application in accordance with Section 73-3-3.5, the information required by Section 73-3-3.5;
any proposed change to the storage of water;
if the change application proposes to quantify saved water, the anticipated quantity of saved water; and
any other information that the state engineer requires.
A shareholder in a water company who seeks to make a change to a water right to which the water company is the record owner shall file a change application in accordance with Section 73-3-3.5.
In a proceeding before the state engineer, the applicant has the burden of producing evidence sufficient to support a reasonable belief that the change can be made in compliance with this section and Section 73-3-8, including evidence:
that the change will not cause a specific existing right to experience quantity impairment;
if applicable, rebutting the presumption of quantity impairment described in Subsection 73-3-8(6)(c); and
that, if the change application proposes to quantify saved water:
the net decrease in depletion or net reduction in diversion can be reliably sustained over the life of the agricultural water optimization project; and
an agricultural water optimization project proposing a net reduction in diversion does not increase depletion allowed by the underlying perfected water right that serves as the basis of the saved water.
A change of an approved application to appropriate water does not:
affect the priority of the original application to appropriate water; or
extend the time period within which the construction of work is to begin or be completed.
Any person who makes a change without first filing and obtaining approval of a change application providing for the change:
obtains no right by the change;
is guilty of an offense punishable under Section 73-2-27 if the change is made knowingly or intentionally; and
shall comply with the change application process; and
obtains no right to saved water.
This section does not apply to the replacement of an existing well by a new well drilled within a radius of 150 feet from the point of diversion of the existing well.
A replacement well must be drilled in accordance with the requirements of Section 73-3-28.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2025 · leading case: Bonham v. Morgan, 788 P.2d 497 (Utah 1989).
Bonham v. Morgan, 788 P.2d 497 (Utah 1989). · cites it 27× “Bonham, who is not a water user, protested against a permanent change application filed under Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (1980) 1 in the office of the defendant state engineer (state engineer) in June of 1984 by defendants Salt Lake *498 County Water Conservancy District and Draper…”
East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. Morgan, 860 P.2d 310 (Utah 1993). · cites it 28× “The right to change a point of diversion, place, or purpose of water is governed by Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (1989), which provides: (a) Any person entitled to the use of water may make: (i) permanent or temporary changes in the place of diversion; (ii) permanent or temporary…”
Rocky Ford v. Kents Lake, 2020 UT 47 (Utah 2020). · cites it 5× “UTAH CODE § 73-3-3 (1953). A change application requests a change in the “place of diversion or use” of the water for a purpose other than that “originally appropriated.”
Rocky Ford v. Kents Lake, 2019 UT 31 (Utah 2019). · cites it 10× “UTAH CODE § 73-3-3 (1953). A changed use involves a change in the “place of diversion or use” of the water for a purpose other than that “originally appropriated.”
Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co., 2006 UT 16 (Utah 2006). · cites it 4× “See Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (Supp.2004). The legislature has designated the state engineer as the appropriate officer to initially determine whether an application seeking permission to initiate such a change should be approved.”
In Re Uintah Basin, 2006 UT 19 (Utah 2006). · cites it 8× “Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2)(a)(i)-(iii) (1989 & Supp.”
Jensen v. Jones, 2011 UT 67 (Utah 2011). · cites it 7× “Section 73-3-3 does discuss additional considerations for temporary change applications, but these considerations likewise do not include any basis for evaluating non-adjudicated forfeiture. See Uran Cove Amn. § 73-3-3(6) (specifying how the "state engineer shall investigate all…”
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co., 2011 UT 33 (Utah 2011). · cites it 2× “Third, we analyze the district court's conclusion that Big Ditch does not have a right under Utah Code section 73-3-3 to file change applications with the State Engineer and hold that the court erred.”
Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co., 966 P.2d 844 (Utah 1998). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (1989), Brooklyn applied to the State Engineer for approval of the change in diversion point.”
Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co., 922 P.2d 745 (Utah 1996). · cites it 3× “” Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2). The Code further provides, “The state engineer shall follow the same procedures, and the rights and duties of the applicants with respect to applications for permanent changes of point of diversion, place, or purpose of use shall be the same, as…”
Haik v. Salt Lake City Corp., 567 F. App'x 621 (10th Cir. 2014). “” Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2)(a). “If an application is approved, the applicant may .”
Est. of Steed Ex Rel. Kazan v. New Escalante Irrigation Co., 846 P.2d 1223 (Utah 1992). · cites it 4× “Our statute that governed change applications when the action was filed read in pertinent part, “Any person entitled to the use of water may change the place of diversion or use and may use the water for other purposes than those for which it was originally appropriated, but no…”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(1)(a) — 1 case
Delta Canal v. Vincent Fam. Ranch, 2013 UT 54 (Utah 2013).
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(2) — 2 cases
East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. Morgan, 860 P.2d 310 (Utah 1993). “The right to change a point of diversion, place, or purpose of water is governed by Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (1989), which provides: (a) Any person entitled to the use of water may make: (i) permanent or temporary changes in the place of diversion; (ii) permanent or temporary…”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(2)(a) — 3 cases
East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. Morgan, 860 P.2d 310 (Utah 1993). “The right to change a point of diversion, place, or purpose of water is governed by Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (1989), which provides: (a) Any person entitled to the use of water may make: (i) permanent or temporary changes in the place of diversion; (ii) permanent or temporary…”
In Re Uintah Basin, 2006 UT 19 (Utah 2006). “Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2)(a)(i)-(iii) (1989 & Supp.”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(2)(a)(i) — 1 case
East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. Morgan, 860 P.2d 310 (Utah 1993). “The right to change a point of diversion, place, or purpose of water is governed by Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (1989), which provides: (a) Any person entitled to the use of water may make: (i) permanent or temporary changes in the place of diversion; (ii) permanent or temporary…”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(4) — 1 case
Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co., 2006 UT 16 (Utah 2006). “See Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (Supp.2004). The legislature has designated the state engineer as the appropriate officer to initially determine whether an application seeking permission to initiate such a change should be approved.”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(4)(b) — 1 case
Jensen v. Jones, 2011 UT 67 (Utah 2011). “Section 73-3-3 does discuss additional considerations for temporary change applications, but these considerations likewise do not include any basis for evaluating non-adjudicated forfeiture. See Uran Cove Amn. § 73-3-3(6) (specifying how the "state engineer shall investigate all…”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(5)(a) — 2 cases
Searle v. Milburn Irrigation Co., 2006 UT 16 (Utah 2006). “See Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2) (Supp.2004). The legislature has designated the state engineer as the appropriate officer to initially determine whether an application seeking permission to initiate such a change should be approved.”
Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co., 922 P.2d 745 (Utah 1996). “” Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (2). The Code further provides, “The state engineer shall follow the same procedures, and the rights and duties of the applicants with respect to applications for permanent changes of point of diversion, place, or purpose of use shall be the same, as…”
— Utah Code § 73-3-3(6) — 1 case
Jensen v. Jones, 2011 UT 67 (Utah 2011). “Section 73-3-3 does discuss additional considerations for temporary change applications, but these considerations likewise do not include any basis for evaluating non-adjudicated forfeiture. See Uran Cove Amn. § 73-3-3(6) (specifying how the "state engineer shall investigate all…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.