Utah Code » Title 76, Chapter 2 — Principles of Criminal Responsibility; part 76-2-2 — Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another
Utah Code

Utah Code § 76-2-204 (2026)

Criminal responsibility of corporation or association

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A corporation or association is guilty of an offense when:

The conduct constituting the offense consists of an omission to discharge a specific duty of affirmative performance imposed on corporations or associations by law; or
The conduct constituting the offense is authorized, solicited, requested, commanded, or undertaken, performed, or recklessly tolerated by the board of directors or by a high managerial agent acting within the scope of employment and in behalf of the corporation or association.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2006 · leading case: Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc., 2006 UT 71 (Utah 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Touchard v. La-Z-Boy Inc., 2006 UT 71 (Utah 2006). · cites it 2× “§§ 76-6-403 , 405 (1995), as well as a statute regulating corporate responsibility, Utah Code Ann. § 76-2-204 (1995). Fox, 931 P.”
Fox v. MCI Commc'ns Corp., 931 P.2d 857 (Utah 1997). “…of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-703 and § 76-6-705 or acts of fraud or embezzlement under § 76-6-403, § 76-6-405, and § 76-2-204 (corporate responsibility). When Fox reported the practices to MCIT’s management, she was told to “mind her own business” and to ignore the account…”
Matter of Est. of Groesbeck, 935 P.2d 1255 (Utah 1997). · cites it 2× “The trial court ruled that the Will was invalid because it left property to an invalid and illusory trust and noted that pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 76-2-204 (1993), a “complete property settlement entered into after or in anticipation of separation or divorce is a waiver of…”
Grace v. Thomason Nissan, 76 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (D. Or. 1999). “§ 45-2-31 l(l)(b); NJ.Stat. Ann. § 2C:2-7(a)(3); N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.