Utah Code » Title 78B, Chapter 11 — Utah Uniform Arbitration Act
Utah Code

Utah Code § 78B-11-125 (2026)

Modification or correction of award

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon motion made within 90 days after the movant receives notice of the award pursuant to Section 78B-11-120 or within 90 days after the movant receives notice of a modified or corrected award pursuant to Section 78B-11-121, the court shall modify or correct the award if:
there was an evident mathematical miscalculation or an evident mistake in the description of a person, thing, or property referred to in the award;
the arbitrator has made an award on a claim not submitted to the arbitrator and the award may be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the claims submitted; or
the award is imperfect in a matter of form not affecting the merits of the decision on the claims submitted.
If a motion made under Subsection (1) is granted, the court shall modify or correct and confirm the award as modified or corrected. Otherwise, unless a motion to vacate is pending, the court shall confirm the award.
A motion to modify or correct an award pursuant to this section may be joined with a motion to vacate the award.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Taylor v. Taylor, 2022 UT 35 (Utah 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Taylor v. Taylor, 2022 UT 35 (Utah 2022). “See UTAH CODE § 78B-11-125. Family code, on the other hand, provides that a district court retains continuing jurisdiction to modify any divorce-related orders.”
Farm Bureau v. Weston, 2025 UT 42 (Utah 2025). · cites it 2× “See UTAH CODE §§ 78B-11-125, -126 (imposing substantive and temporal limitations for modifying, correcting, and vacating arbitration awards).”
Am. Home Sys., LLC v. Cambria Homeowners Ass'n, 2012 UT App 306 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “§ 11 ; see also Utah Code Ann. § 78B-11-125 (stating the grounds for modification or correction of an arbitration award).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.