Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 151
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : PERMITS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6081)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 98 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 12× “§ 6086(a), as required by 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). We agree and therefore reverse.”
In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231), 2009 VT 16 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 12× “The operative statute is 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a), which provides: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any interest in any subdivision located in this state, or commence construction on a subdivision or development, or commence development without a permit.”
In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2, 2009 VT 71 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 12× “§ 219 (electric companies, and other corporations subject to regulation under chapter 5, Title 30, "shall be required to furnish reasonably adequate service, accommodation, and facilities to the public"), id.”
In Re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 7× “The law then limits that sweeping requirement, however, by defining development, in pertinent part, as “the construction of improvements on a tract of land involving more than 10 acres which is to be used for municipal or state purposes.” 10 V.S.A. § 6001 (3).”
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 6× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). The rules implementing the statute also require application for a permit if there is a substantial change to any preexisting development and application for an amended permit if there is a material change to any permitted development.”
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 3× “In terms of development specifically, Act 250—and its accompanying regulations—require a new permit for “commenc[ing] development” or “substantial[ly] chang[ing]” a pre-existing development, 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a)-(b), and an amended permit for “material[ly] chang[ing] .”
In Re Barlow, 631 A.2d 853 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 6× “They argue that their operation is exempted from review by 10 V.S.A. § 6081(b) because it preexisted the enactment of Act 250.”
In Re Vitale, 563 A.2d 613 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 4× “§ 6001(3), [1] thus requiring an Act *615 250 permit under 10 V.S.A. § 6081. [2] The Board interpreted § 6001(3)'s definition of "development" in light of Board Rule 2(A)(2) [3] and concluded that petitioner had exercised "control" over the full 1.”
State of Vermont Env't Bd. v. Chickering, 583 A.2d 607 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 5× “The State sued defendant in July 1986, alleging that he subdivided properties in Westminster into ten or more lots within a continuous ten-year period without an Act 250 permit, contrary to 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). 1 The action sought civil penalties under 10 V.”
In Re Audet, 2004 VT 30 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A § 6081(a). In a municipality that has not adopted permanent zoning and subdivision bylaws, such as the Town of Worcester, development is defined as “[t]he construction of improvements for commercial or industrial purposes on more than one acre of land.”
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 3× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6081. 3 The term “development,” as used in § 6081(a), is defined to mean, in pertinent part, “the construction of improvements on a tract or tracts of land, owned or controlled by a person, involving more than 10 acres of land within a radius of five miles of any…”
In Re Orzel, 491 A.2d 1013 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 3× “Petitioners claim that this determination prevents the Board from claiming, at a later date, that a permit is required for the continued use of the gravel pit.”
Show all 98 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(1) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(1)(3) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(1)(5) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(1X1) — 1 case
In Re Estates of Allen, 2011 VT 95 (Vt. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(a) — 60 cases
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). “§ 6086(a), as required by 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). We agree and therefore reverse.”
In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231), 2009 VT 16 (Vt. 2009). “The operative statute is 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a), which provides: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any interest in any subdivision located in this state, or commence construction on a subdivision or development, or commence development without a permit.”
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). “In terms of development specifically, Act 250—and its accompanying regulations—require a new permit for “commenc[ing] development” or “substantial[ly] chang[ing]” a pre-existing development, 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a)-(b), and an amended permit for “material[ly] chang[ing] .”
State of Vermont Env't Bd. v. Chickering, 583 A.2d 607 (Vt. 1990). “The State sued defendant in July 1986, alleging that he subdivided properties in Westminster into ten or more lots within a continuous ten-year period without an Act 250 permit, contrary to 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). 1 The action sought civil penalties under 10 V.”
In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2, 2009 VT 71 (Vt. 2009). “§ 219 (electric companies, and other corporations subject to regulation under chapter 5, Title 30, "shall be required to furnish reasonably adequate service, accommodation, and facilities to the public"), id.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(a)(1) — 1 case
NE Materials Grp., LLC Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(b) — 29 cases
In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure & Use at Burlington Int'l Airport for F-35A, 2015 VT 41 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a). The rules implementing the statute also require application for a permit if there is a substantial change to any preexisting development and application for an amended permit if there is a material change to any permitted development.”
In Re Barlow, 631 A.2d 853 (Vt. 1993). “They argue that their operation is exempted from review by 10 V.S.A. § 6081(b) because it preexisted the enactment of Act 250.”
In re Mountain Top Inn & Resort, JO 1-391 (Katherine Hall, Appellant), 2020 VT 57 (Vt. 2020). “In terms of development specifically, Act 250—and its accompanying regulations—require a new permit for “commenc[ing] development” or “substantial[ly] chang[ing]” a pre-existing development, 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a)-(b), and an amended permit for “material[ly] chang[ing] .”
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC Act 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc, Marc Bernier, Appellants), 2016 VT 87 (Vt. 2016).
In Re Vermont Verde Antique Int'l, Inc., 811 A.2d 181 (Vt. 2002).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(b)(2) — 1 case
In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231), 2009 VT 16 (Vt. 2009). “The operative statute is 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a), which provides: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any interest in any subdivision located in this state, or commence construction on a subdivision or development, or commence development without a permit.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(h) — 1 case
Sec'y, Agency of Nat. Resources v. Upper Valley Reg'l Landfill Corp., 705 A.2d 1001 (Vt. 1997).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(j) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(k)(1) — 1 case
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants), 2015 VT 79 (Vt. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(k)(2) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(k)(l) — 2 cases
In re North East Materials Grp. LLC Act 250 JO 5-21, 199 Vt. 577 (Vt. 2015).
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(l)(3) — 1 case
In re Catamount Slate, Inc., 2004 VT 14 (Vt. 2004).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(p) — 2 cases
In Re Windham Windsor Hous. Trust JO Appeal (Deborah Lazar & Laura Campbell, Appellants), 2024 VT 73 (Vt. 2024).
Windham Windsor Hous. Trust JO Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(r) — 1 case
In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2, 2009 VT 71 (Vt. 2009). “§ 219 (electric companies, and other corporations subject to regulation under chapter 5, Title 30, "shall be required to furnish reasonably adequate service, accommodation, and facilities to the public"), id.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(s) — 1 case
In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231), 2009 VT 16 (Vt. 2009). “The operative statute is 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a), which provides: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any interest in any subdivision located in this state, or commence construction on a subdivision or development, or commence development without a permit.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(s)(1) — 1 case
WhistlePig, LLC Act 250 JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(s)(2) — 1 case
In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231), 2009 VT 16 (Vt. 2009). “The operative statute is 10 V.S.A. § 6081(a), which provides: "No person shall sell or offer for sale any interest in any subdivision located in this state, or commence construction on a subdivision or development, or commence development without a permit.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6081(w)(1) — 1 case
Laberge Shooting Range JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.