Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412 (2026)

Required provisions and prohibited effects

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 007 : BYLAWS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4412)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 113 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65, 312 A.3d 491.
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65, 312 A.3d 491. · cites it 11× “If DCF were allowed to hold juveniles at the facility because it alone “regards” them as having an impairment that limits a major life activity, why would it have to make any effort to assess them after placement at all? I submit that it is because § 4501(2) cannot possibly mean…”
In re Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal-Westminster DRB Permit No. 21-70 (Daniel Deitz, Appellants), 2024 VT 66, 327 A.3d 886. · cites it 3× “This rule was enacted pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3), which allows land development “on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road, class 4 town highway, or public waters” only where “access through a permanent easement or right-of-way has been approved” by a local…”
Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc., 2014 VT 99, 107 A.3d 327. · cites it 3× “The trial court concluded, however, that the City’s definition conflicted with the state’s enabling statute, which provides that land development “may be permitted on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road or public waters, provided that access through a…”
In re Appeal of Bailey, 883 A.2d 765 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 3× “§ 4406(1) was amended effective July 1, 2004 to include a proviso stating that the statute “shall [not] be construed to prohibit a bylaw that is less restrictive of development of existing small lots.” 24 V.S.A. §4412(2)(C); see 2003, No.”
In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc., 2006 VT 52, 904 A.2d 1145. · cites it 2× “§ 4601(1) with 24 V.S.A. § 4412(2)). The amended statute is not applicable here.”
Nordlund v. Van Nostrand, 2011 VT 79, 27 A.3d 340. · cites it 2× “Plaintiff relies on the language in both 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) and Zoning Regulation § 502, alleging these preclude the use of any means of access other than the approved right-of-way.”
In re 15-17 Weston Street NOV (Keith S. Aaron, Weston Street Trust, Appellant), 2021 VT 85, 266 A.3d 770. · cites it 3× “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412(7) (“All bylaws shall define how nonconformities will be addressed, including standards for nonconforming uses .”
32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington, 2026 VT 9, 356 A.3d 1145. · cites it 3× “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412 (describing that zoning “bylaws shall define how nonconformities will be addressed”).”
Vermont Human Rights Comm'n v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 2024 VT 71. “” Citing 24 V.S.A. § 4412(1)(A), which requires municipal panels to ensure that the application of bylaws does not have “the effect of discriminating in the permitting of housing as specified in 9 V.”
VTRE Investments, LLC v. MontChilly, Inc., 2020 VT 77, 213 VT 175. “24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) (describing minimum width of permanent access easements for development subject to zoning regulation).”
In re Verburg & Wesco, Inc., 616 A.2d 237 (Vt. 1992). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412. We are unwilling to infer that DEC has adopted a separate regulatory system in the subdivision regulations.”
In re Appeal of Van Nostrand, 2008 VT 77, 957 A.2d 399. “Thus, 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) provides: Land development may be permitted on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road or public waters, provided that access through a permanent easement or right-of-way has been approved in accordance with standards and process…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1): 2 cases
HCRS NOV, No. 16-2-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 19, 2013).
Gould Accessory Dwelling Application, No. 33-3-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 23, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(A): 3 cases
Vermont Human Rights Comm'n v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 2024 VT 71. “” Citing 24 V.S.A. § 4412(1)(A), which requires municipal panels to ensure that the application of bylaws does not have “the effect of discriminating in the permitting of housing as specified in 9 V.”
human rights comm v. st johnsbury, No. 23-cv-1316 (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 2, 2024).
Groundworks Collaborative Site Plan Application - Decision on Motion, No. 25-ENV-00013 (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 2, 2025).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(B): 1 case
Town of Berlin v. Harr, LLC, No. 24-ENV-00049 (Vt. Super. Ct. July 12, 2024).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(E): 19 cases
Gould Accessory Bldg. Permit, No. 14-1-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 7, 2012).
Burns 12 Weston Street NOV - Decision on Motion, No. 75-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 14, 2021).
40 Kingsland Terrace Garage & ADU Permit - Decision on Motion, No. 21-ENV-00037 (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2022).
Gould Accessory Dwelling Application, No. 33-3-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 23, 2011).
Rouleau Prop. Appeals, No. 231-12-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 24, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(E)(i): 2 cases
Gould Accessory Bldg. After Remad, No. 14-1-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 31, 2012).
Rouleau Prop. Appeals, No. 231-12-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 24, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(E)(ii): 2 cases
Gould Accessory Bldg. After Remad, No. 14-1-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 31, 2012).
40 Kingsland Terrace Garage & ADU Permit - Decision on Motion, No. 21-ENV-00037 (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2022).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(E)(iii): 1 case
Rouleau Prop. Appeals, No. 231-12-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 24, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(F): 2 cases
1417 Joes Brook Road CU Permit Application - Decision on Merits, No. 25-ENV-00004 (Vt. Super. Ct. June 6, 2025).
Fenoff Variance Amendment, No. 32-2-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 30, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(F)(ii): 1 case
Gould Accessory Dwelling Application, No. 33-3-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 23, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(G): 2 cases
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65, 312 A.3d 491. “If DCF were allowed to hold juveniles at the facility because it alone “regards” them as having an impairment that limits a major life activity, why would it have to make any effort to assess them after placement at all? I submit that it is because § 4501(2) cannot possibly mean…”
HCRS NOV, No. 16-2-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 19, 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(1)(d): 1 case
336 Cote Hill Road Zoning Permit Appeal 2025-036 - Decision on Motion, No. 25-ENV-00080 (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 31, 2025).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(11): 1 case
Town of Marshfield v. Harris - Decision on Motions, No. 22-ENV-00012 (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 31, 2024).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(13): 1 case
Purvis Nonconforming Use, No. 45-5-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(2): 22 cases
In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc., 2006 VT 52, 904 A.2d 1145. “§ 4601(1) with 24 V.S.A. § 4412(2)). The amended statute is not applicable here.”
In re Appeal of Bailey, 883 A.2d 765 (Vt. 2005). “§ 4406(1) was amended effective July 1, 2004 to include a proviso stating that the statute “shall [not] be construed to prohibit a bylaw that is less restrictive of development of existing small lots.” 24 V.S.A. §4412(2)(C); see 2003, No.”
Nowicki Bldg. Permit, No. 77-04-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 8, 2006).
Mastelli Constr. Application, No. 220-10-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 18, 2008).
Appeal of Robustelli Realty, No. 255-12-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 25, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(2)(A)(i): 1 case
Quality Mkt.-Parnigoni Lot, No. 53-3-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 31, 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(2)(B): 2 cases
Quality Mkt.-Parnigoni Lot, No. 53-3-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 31, 2009).
Packard Ridge Lots Merger, No. 159-11-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 24, 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(2)(C): 5 cases
In re Appeal of Bailey, 883 A.2d 765 (Vt. 2005). “§ 4406(1) was amended effective July 1, 2004 to include a proviso stating that the statute “shall [not] be construed to prohibit a bylaw that is less restrictive of development of existing small lots.” 24 V.S.A. §4412(2)(C); see 2003, No.”
In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc., 2006 VT 52, 904 A.2d 1145. “§ 4601(1) with 24 V.S.A. § 4412(2)). The amended statute is not applicable here.”
Chimney Ridge Road Merged Parcels, No. 208-9-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 31, 2009).
Appeal of Jenness & Berrie, No. 134-07-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 18, 2007).
Appeal of LaBounty Enter., Inc., No. 232-12-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 16, 2005).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(3): 20 cases
In re Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal-Westminster DRB Permit No. 21-70 (Daniel Deitz, Appellants), 2024 VT 66, 327 A.3d 886. “This rule was enacted pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3), which allows land development “on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road, class 4 town highway, or public waters” only where “access through a permanent easement or right-of-way has been approved” by a local…”
Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc., 2014 VT 99, 107 A.3d 327. “The trial court concluded, however, that the City’s definition conflicted with the state’s enabling statute, which provides that land development “may be permitted on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road or public waters, provided that access through a…”
Nordlund v. Van Nostrand, 2011 VT 79, 27 A.3d 340. “Plaintiff relies on the language in both 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) and Zoning Regulation § 502, alleging these preclude the use of any means of access other than the approved right-of-way.”
VTRE Investments, LLC v. MontChilly, Inc., 2020 VT 77, 213 VT 175. “24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) (describing minimum width of permanent access easements for development subject to zoning regulation).”
In re Appeal of Van Nostrand, 2008 VT 77, 957 A.2d 399. “Thus, 24 V.S.A. § 4412(3) provides: Land development may be permitted on lots that do not have frontage either on a public road or public waters, provided that access through a permanent easement or right-of-way has been approved in accordance with standards and process…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(3)(2005): 1 case
Appeal of Carroll, No. 3-01-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 20, 2007).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(4): 6 cases
Shatney Home Occupation Denial, No. 43-4-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 18, 2017).
Sheldrick Bldg. Permit, No. 185-09-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 30, 2008).
Marsh Zoning Permit, No. 135-7-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 10, 2009).
Chandler Home Indus./Home Occupation Application, No. 128-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2009).
Chandler Home Repair Application, No. 129-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 2, 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(5): 1 case
The Nat. Child Sch. LLC CU - Decision on the Merits, No. 59-8-20 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 2, 2021).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(6): 1 case
Williamson third Tier Application, No. 55-4-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 7, 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7): 22 cases
32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington, 2026 VT 9, 356 A.3d 1145. “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412 (describing that zoning “bylaws shall define how nonconformities will be addressed”).”
In re 15-17 Weston Street NOV (Keith S. Aaron, Weston Street Trust, Appellant), 2021 VT 85, 266 A.3d 770. “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412(7) (“All bylaws shall define how nonconformities will be addressed, including standards for nonconforming uses .”
Old Lantern Non-Conforming Use, No. 154-12-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 7, 2017).
Old Lantern Non-Conforming Use, No. 154-12-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 3, 2017).
Purvis Nonconforming Use, No. 45-5-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7)(A): 8 cases
Purvis Nonconforming Use, No. 45-5-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2016).
Town of Berlin v. Harr, LLC, No. 24-ENV-00049 24-ENV-00098 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 28, 2025).
Killington Moutain House LLC NOV - Decision on Motion, No. 138-12-18 Vtec 30-2-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 17, 2020).
Lakehouse Pub Grille Permit, No. 80-6-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 19, 2015).
Musto Cosntruction Permit, No. 132-7-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7)(A)(i): 4 cases
In re 15-17 Weston Street NOV (Keith S. Aaron, Weston Street Trust, Appellant), 2021 VT 85, 266 A.3d 770. “See 24 V.S.A. § 4412(7) (“All bylaws shall define how nonconformities will be addressed, including standards for nonconforming uses .”
Purvis North Willard Street - Decision on Motion, No. 88-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 23, 2020).
Purvis Nonconforming Use, No. 45-5-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 27, 2016).
Town of Berlin v. Harr, LLC, No. 24-ENV-00049 24-ENV-00098 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 28, 2025).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7)(A)(iii): 3 cases
Crandall & Stearns Waiver & Deck Application, No. 134-9-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 12, 2013).
Edgar Northshore Drive Variance Application, No. 292-12-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Feb. 5, 2009).
Curry Variance Application, No. 222-10-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Feb. 5, 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7)(B): 2 cases
Town of Berlin v. Harr, LLC, No. 24-ENV-00049 24-ENV-00098 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 28, 2025).
Town of Berlin v. Harr, LLC, No. 24-ENV-00049 (Vt. Super. Ct. July 12, 2024).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(7)(c): 1 case
Old Lantern Non-Conforming Use, No. 154-12-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 13, 2017).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(9): 3 cases
New Cengular Wireless, dba AT&T Sousa Telecomm., No. 162-7-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 30, 2009).
New Cingular Wireless dba AT&T Sousa Telecomm. Permit, No. 162-7-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 14, 2009).
RCC Atl., Inc. & Sousa Appeal of Jones Leinoff, No. 163-7-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 8, 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4412(E): 1 case
Town of Greensboro v. Pellegrini, No. 87-05-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 7, 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.