Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Tokens are never shown here. To issue one against this same account — claude.ai custom connectors
and ChatGPT developer mode need one — start the activation flow.
It lands on the handle above. Install instructions.
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
A person who willfully and with intent to injure or defraud the insurer sets fire
to or burns or attempts so to do or who willfully and maliciously causes to be burned
or who willfully and maliciously aids, counsels, or procures the burning of any building,
structure, or personal property, of whatsoever class or character, whether the property
of himself or herself or of another, which shall at the time be insured by any person,
company, or corporation against loss or damage by fire, shall be imprisoned not more
than five years nor less than one year or fined not more than $500.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1965–2013 · leading case: State v. Vuley, 2013 VT 9 (Vt. 2013).
State v. Vuley, 2013 VT 9 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2ד” Initially, the State also charged him with four counts of setting a fire to defraud an insurer in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 506. However, although the family had renters’ insurance that paid out on the first and fourth fires, defendant’s wife insisted that defendant was unaware…”
State v. Bonilla, 477 A.2d 983 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2ד§ 503, and of burning to defraud an insurer, 13 V.S.A. § 506. In his appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Vermont, Unit No.”
State v. Mosher, 465 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1983). “Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of counseling burning to defraud an insurer, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 506. He submits three issues on appeal: (1) that the trial court lacked jurisdiction, (2) that the trial court committed plain error in its jury charge, and (3)…”
State v. Huginski, 422 A.2d 935 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 2ד§ 502) and burning with intent to defraud an insurer (13 V.S.A. § 506). The prosecution was begun by a two-count information filed by the Windham County State’s Attorney.”
State v. Ciocca, 209 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1965). “It charged the respondent with the commission of a crime, which for all practical purposes at this point, alleged the attempted burning of a building to defraud certain insurers, a violation of 13 V.S.A. §506. Various pre-trial motions aimed at the sufficiency of the information…”
State v. Ciocca, 225 A.2d 65 (Vt. 1966). “At the March Term, 1964, of Chittenden County Court, the petitioner was tried and convicted by a jury of an attempt to procure the burning of a building known as “Bob’s Spaghetti House,” located in South Burlington, Vermont, a violation of 13 V.S.A. §506. At this trial he was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.