Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 011 : MISCELLANEOUS REGULATORY POWERS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 2291)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc. v. Village of Essex Junction
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc. v. Village of Essex Junction (1973) vt · cites it 10× “In that regard, a determination must be made whether or not the ordinance is the result of a proper exercise of the *453 delegated municipal power contained within 24 V.S.A. § 2291, which provides in part: “For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare and…”
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass'n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park District (2006) vt · cites it 2× “First, it relies on 24 V.S.A. § 2291(8), which states that municipalities have the authority “[t]o regulate or prohibit the use or discharge, but not possession of, firearms within the municipality or specified portions thereof.”
City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc. (2009) vt “§ 1111], be constructed and maintained by a person or corporation upon or under a highway, in such manner as not to interfere with repairs of such highway or the public convenience in traveling upon or using the same.”
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants) (2021) vt · cites it 2× “§ 4414(15) or a municipal ordinance adopted under 24 V.S.A. § 2291(28), and the recommendation of a municipality applying such a bylaw or ordinance .”
North Country Sportsman's Club v. Town of Williston (2017) vt · cites it 3× “24 V.S.A. § 2291(8). The Legislature long ago delegated to towns the authority to regulate or prohibit the use of firearms, but the restriction on that authority is relatively new, having taken effect on May 22, 2006.”
32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington (2026) vt · cites it 4× “; see 24 V.S.A. § 2291 (“For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare, and convenience, a town, city, or incorporated village 5 ¶ 9.”
State v. Sanguinetti (1982) vt · cites it 3× “These were first, the fact that § 4408(c) was repealed in 1980, second, the combined effect of a legislatively mandated general savings clause in the 1974 revised City Charter at Title XIV, Section 2, and a provision from an earlier 1955 version of that Charter, at Section 17,…”
SBC Enterprises, Inc. v. City of South Burlington Liquor Control Commission (1996) vt · cites it 3× “Section 12 of the entertainment ordinance states that the ordinance is enacted by the City Council under the authority granted by 24 V.S.A. § 2291 and by the South Burlington City Charter.”
Vermont Agency of Transportation v. Sumner (1983) vt · cites it 2× “2d at 196 ; see also 24 V.S.A. §§ 2291(12), (13) and (14). See generally Napro Development Corp.”
State v. Yorkey (1995) vt · cites it 2× “§ 1007, which provides for increases and decreases in speed limits by municipalities under *357 certain conditions, and 24 V.S.A. § 2291(4), a general grant of authority to municipalities which provides that “[f]or the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare and…”
Napro Development Corp. v. Town of Berlin (1977) vt “The Board is endowed with a statutory power to define what constitutes a public nuisance, 24 V.S.A. § 2291(14), a statute which must be read in conjunction with the abatement power pursuant to 18 V.”
Pope v. Town of Windsor (1981) vt “The Town is proceeding pursuant to its police power, 24 V.S.A. § 2291(13), (14), and the land on which the dangerous building is situated is still the property of the plaintiff and is not subject to condemnation.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(11) — 3 cases
Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc. v. Village of Essex Junction (1973) vt “In that regard, a determination must be made whether or not the ordinance is the result of a proper exercise of the *453 delegated municipal power contained within 24 V.S.A. § 2291, which provides in part: “For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare and…”
SBC Enterprises, Inc. v. City of South Burlington Liquor Control Commission (1996) vt “Section 12 of the entertainment ordinance states that the ordinance is enacted by the City Council under the authority granted by 24 V.S.A. § 2291 and by the South Burlington City Charter.”
Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc. v. Village of Essex Junction (1975) vt
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(12) — 1 case
Vermont Agency of Transportation v. Sumner (1983) vt “2d at 196 ; see also 24 V.S.A. §§ 2291(12), (13) and (14). See generally Napro Development Corp.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(13) — 1 case
Pope v. Town of Windsor (1981) vt “The Town is proceeding pursuant to its police power, 24 V.S.A. § 2291(13), (14), and the land on which the dangerous building is situated is still the property of the plaintiff and is not subject to condemnation.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(14) — 3 cases
Napro Development Corp. v. Town of Berlin (1977) vt “The Board is endowed with a statutory power to define what constitutes a public nuisance, 24 V.S.A. § 2291(14), a statute which must be read in conjunction with the abatement power pursuant to 18 V.”
Rockwood v. City of Burlington, VT. (1998) vtd
Donald Bishop v. Town of Springfield (2016) vt
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(19) — 2 cases
New Cengular Wireless, dba AT&T Sousa Telecommunications (2009) vtsuperct
New Cingular Wireless dba AT&T Sousa Telecommunications Permit (2009) vtsuperct
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(28) — 1 case
In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants) (2021) vt “§ 4414(15) or a municipal ordinance adopted under 24 V.S.A. § 2291(28), and the recommendation of a municipality applying such a bylaw or ordinance .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(29) — 3 cases
32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington (2026) vt “; see 24 V.S.A. § 2291 (“For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare, and convenience, a town, city, or incorporated village 5 ¶ 9.”
32 Intervale v. City of Burlington (2024) vtsuperct
32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington (2025) vt
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(4) — 1 case
State v. Yorkey (1995) vt “§ 1007, which provides for increases and decreases in speed limits by municipalities under *357 certain conditions, and 24 V.S.A. § 2291(4), a general grant of authority to municipalities which provides that “[f]or the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, welfare and…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(6) — 1 case
City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc. (2009) vt “§ 1111], be constructed and maintained by a person or corporation upon or under a highway, in such manner as not to interfere with repairs of such highway or the public convenience in traveling upon or using the same.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(7) — 1 case
State v. Sanguinetti (1982) vt “These were first, the fact that § 4408(c) was repealed in 1980, second, the combined effect of a legislatively mandated general savings clause in the 1974 revised City Charter at Title XIV, Section 2, and a provision from an earlier 1955 version of that Charter, at Section 17,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2291(8) — 3 cases
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass'n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park District (2006) vt “First, it relies on 24 V.S.A. § 2291(8), which states that municipalities have the authority “[t]o regulate or prohibit the use or discharge, but not possession of, firearms within the municipality or specified portions thereof.”
North Country Sportsman's Club v. Town of Williston (2017) vt “24 V.S.A. § 2291(8). The Legislature long ago delegated to towns the authority to regulate or prohibit the use of firearms, but the restriction on that authority is relatively new, having taken effect on May 22, 2006.”
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Assoc. of VT v. Winooski Valley Park District (2006) vt
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.