Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : BOARD OF MEDICAL PRACTICE

(Cite as: 26 V.S.A. § 1354)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Delozier v. State, 631 A.2d 228 (Vt. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Delozier v. State, 631 A.2d 228 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 14× “Licensee's attorney asked the Board to close the file because licensee's conduct did not fall within the statutory criteria of unprofessional conduct listed in 26 V.S.A. § 1354. The investigatory committee considered this request and, after obtaining information as to the…”
LoPresti v. Rutland Reg'l Health Servs., Inc., 2004 VT 105 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 3× “LoPresti claims that his decision not to refer patients to these specialists was guided heavily by Vermont’s prohibition on unprofessional conduct contained in 26 V.S.A. §§ 1354, 1398, and by numerous provisions of the AMA Principles.”
In Re Appeal of Chase, 2009 VT 94 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 5× “Chase’s conduct toward each of the ten patients represented a gross failure to exercise the degree of care exercised by ordinary, careful physicians in similar situations, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(22). The Board also found that Dr.”
In re Jon Porter, M.D., 2012 VT 97 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 2× “The committee found that the PA’s prescription of controlled substances constituted a “failure to conform to the essential standards of acceptable and prevailing practice,” in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(b)(2), and that, “[s]ince the acts of the agent .”
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 4× “26 V.S.A. § 1354. The appellant does not deny the fact of either the conviction or the revocation.”
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 465 A.2d 291 (Vt. 1983). “No challenge is raised regarding the support in the record for the sanction of revocation; in view of the provisions of 26 V.S.A. §§ 1354(3) and (23), such a position would be untenable.”
Nat'l Inst. of Fam. & Life Advocates v. Clark (D. Vt. 2024). “§ 129a(f)(2)(B); 26 V.S.A. § 1354(d)(2)(B)). Plaintiffs argue that these definitions are also unconstitutionally broad, allowing for arbitrary enforcement.”
McClary v. Uvm Med Ctr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” Plaintiff cites a statute that prohibits physicians from “willfully making and filing false reports or records in his or her practice as a physician,” 26 V.S.A. § 1354(8), but such conduct is regulated by the Board of Medical Practice and the statute does not establish a…”
Hitchcock v. Emergency Servs. of New England, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “Provost v. Fletcher Allen Health 3 In ¶ 67 of their Statement of Facts, in ostensible support of the proposition that “unprofessional conduct is separate and distinct from a deviation from the standard of care”, Plaintiffs cite to Ex.”
ProSelect Ins. Co. v. Levy (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “See 26 V.S.A. § 1354 (“unprofessional conduct”); 33 V.”
Nash v. Wennar, 645 F. Supp. 238 (D. Vt. 1986). “26 V.S.A. § 1354(7), (19) and (22) (defining the term "unprofessional conduct” to include immoral conduct while practicing as a physician, the consistent use of nonaccepted procedures, and failure to use reasonable skill whether or not actual injury to the patient results).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(23) — 1 case
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). “26 V.S.A. § 1354. The appellant does not deny the fact of either the conviction or the revocation.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(3) — 3 cases
Delozier v. State, 631 A.2d 228 (Vt. 1993). “Licensee's attorney asked the Board to close the file because licensee's conduct did not fall within the statutory criteria of unprofessional conduct listed in 26 V.S.A. § 1354. The investigatory committee considered this request and, after obtaining information as to the…”
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). “26 V.S.A. § 1354. The appellant does not deny the fact of either the conviction or the revocation.”
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 465 A.2d 291 (Vt. 1983). “No challenge is raised regarding the support in the record for the sanction of revocation; in view of the provisions of 26 V.S.A. §§ 1354(3) and (23), such a position would be untenable.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(7) — 2 cases
Delozier v. State, 631 A.2d 228 (Vt. 1993). “Licensee's attorney asked the Board to close the file because licensee's conduct did not fall within the statutory criteria of unprofessional conduct listed in 26 V.S.A. § 1354. The investigatory committee considered this request and, after obtaining information as to the…”
Nash v. Wennar, 645 F. Supp. 238 (D. Vt. 1986). “26 V.S.A. § 1354(7), (19) and (22) (defining the term "unprofessional conduct” to include immoral conduct while practicing as a physician, the consistent use of nonaccepted procedures, and failure to use reasonable skill whether or not actual injury to the patient results).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(8) — 1 case
McClary v. Uvm Med Ctr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” Plaintiff cites a statute that prohibits physicians from “willfully making and filing false reports or records in his or her practice as a physician,” 26 V.S.A. § 1354(8), but such conduct is regulated by the Board of Medical Practice and the statute does not establish a…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(a)(22) — 1 case
In Re Appeal of Chase, 2009 VT 94 (Vt. 2009). “Chase’s conduct toward each of the ten patients represented a gross failure to exercise the degree of care exercised by ordinary, careful physicians in similar situations, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(22). The Board also found that Dr.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(a)(7) — 1 case
LoPresti v. Rutland Reg'l Health Servs., Inc., 2004 VT 105 (Vt. 2004). “LoPresti claims that his decision not to refer patients to these specialists was guided heavily by Vermont’s prohibition on unprofessional conduct contained in 26 V.S.A. §§ 1354, 1398, and by numerous provisions of the AMA Principles.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(a)(8) — 1 case
In Re Appeal of Chase, 2009 VT 94 (Vt. 2009). “Chase’s conduct toward each of the ten patients represented a gross failure to exercise the degree of care exercised by ordinary, careful physicians in similar situations, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(22). The Board also found that Dr.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(b) — 1 case
In Re Appeal of Chase, 2009 VT 94 (Vt. 2009). “Chase’s conduct toward each of the ten patients represented a gross failure to exercise the degree of care exercised by ordinary, careful physicians in similar situations, in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(a)(22). The Board also found that Dr.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(b)(2) — 1 case
In re Jon Porter, M.D., 2012 VT 97 (Vt. 2012). “The committee found that the PA’s prescription of controlled substances constituted a “failure to conform to the essential standards of acceptable and prevailing practice,” in violation of 26 V.S.A. § 1354(b)(2), and that, “[s]ince the acts of the agent .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1354(d)(2)(B) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Fam. & Life Advocates v. Clark (D. Vt. 2024). “§ 129a(f)(2)(B); 26 V.S.A. § 1354(d)(2)(B)). Plaintiffs argue that these definitions are also unconstitutionally broad, allowing for arbitrary enforcement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.