Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 1852 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : BILL OF RIGHTS FOR HOSPITAL PATIENTS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 1852)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1999–2020 · leading case: Baker v. State, 744 A.2d 864 (Vt. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baker v. State, 744 A.2d 864 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 2; hospital visitation and other rights incident to the medical treatment of a family member, under 18 V.S.A. § 1852; and the right to receive, and the obligation to provide, spousal support, maintenance, and property division in the event of separation or divorce, under 15 V.”
Carole Kuligoski, Individually & On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, & Mark Kuligoski & James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat & Ne. Kingdom Human Servs., 2016 VT 54A (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “directly or indirectly identifying ... an individual whose hospitalization or care has been sought or provided under this part, together with clinical information relating to such persons shall be kept confidential and shall not be disclosed by any person”); id.”
Elizabeth Lawson v. Patricia Halpern-Reiss & Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr., 212 A.3d 1213 (Vt. 2019). “Many of this state's laws underscore Vermont's policy of protecting patient confidentiality by prohibiting the disclosure of patient information.”
Carole Kuligoski, Individually & On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, Mark Kuligoski & James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat & Ne. Kingdom Human Servs., 2016 VT 54 (Vt. 2016). “Second, by their own terms, each of the confidentiality statutes cited by amici curiae exempt the situation here: 18 V.S.A. § 1852(a)(7) prohibits unauthorized access to patient records only, rather than general information for warning purposes, while id.”
Howard Ctr. v. Off. of Prof. Reg. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “Section 129a(a)(16) expressly provides an exception to the patient’s privilege in the specific circumstance of OPR investigations.”
Haggerty v. Hathaway (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “503; 18 V.S.A. § 1852(a)(7) (Patients’ Bill of Rights for confidentiality of records).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 1852(a)(7) — 5 cases
Carole Kuligoski, Individually & On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, & Mark Kuligoski & James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat & Ne. Kingdom Human Servs., 2016 VT 54A (Vt. 2016). “directly or indirectly identifying ... an individual whose hospitalization or care has been sought or provided under this part, together with clinical information relating to such persons shall be kept confidential and shall not be disclosed by any person”); id.”
Elizabeth Lawson v. Patricia Halpern-Reiss & Cent. Vermont Med. Ctr., 212 A.3d 1213 (Vt. 2019). “Many of this state's laws underscore Vermont's policy of protecting patient confidentiality by prohibiting the disclosure of patient information.”
Carole Kuligoski, Individually & On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, Mark Kuligoski & James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat & Ne. Kingdom Human Servs., 2016 VT 54 (Vt. 2016). “Second, by their own terms, each of the confidentiality statutes cited by amici curiae exempt the situation here: 18 V.S.A. § 1852(a)(7) prohibits unauthorized access to patient records only, rather than general information for warning purposes, while id.”
Howard Ctr. v. Off. of Prof. Reg. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “Section 129a(a)(16) expressly provides an exception to the patient’s privilege in the specific circumstance of OPR investigations.”
Haggerty v. Hathaway (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “503; 18 V.S.A. § 1852(a)(7) (Patients’ Bill of Rights for confidentiality of records).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.