If any person (1) forge any coin, note or bill current by law or usage in this Commonwealth or any note or bill of a banking company, (2) fraudulently make any base coin, or a note or bill purporting to be the note or bill of a banking company, when such company does not exist, or (3) utter, or attempt to employ as true, or sell, exchange, or deliver, or offer to sell, exchange, or deliver, or receive on sale, exchange, or delivery, with intent to utter or employ, or to have the same uttered or employed as true, any such false, forged, or base coin, note or bill, knowing it to be so, he shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony.
Code 1950, § 18.1-94; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
14
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case:
Moore v. Commonwealth, 722 S.E.2d 668 (Va. Ct. App. 2012).
Moore v. Commonwealth, 722 S.E.2d 668 (Va. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 8× “2-178, three counts of uttering a forged note under Code § 18.2-170, three counts of forgery of a note under Code § 18.”
Nelson v. Commonwealth, 650 S.E.2d 562 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Grella charged Nelson with uttering a forged note under Code § 18.2-170. 2 . This case is styled Marquise Leon Nelson v.”
Campbell v. Commonwealth, 409 S.E.2d 21 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “2-169; forging coins, bank notes or currency, Code § 18.2-170; possession of instruments for forging a writing, Code § 18.”
Stevenson v. Commonwealth, 499 S.E.2d 580 (Va. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “2-169 (forgery of "seal"); Code § 18.2-170 (forgery of "coin or bank notes").”
Carlton v. Commonwealth, 478 S.E.2d 730 (Va. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 4× “1-4017 with the crime of uttering a counterfeit note, a counterfeit bill, or counterfeit money “knowing it to be so,” as established by Code § 18.2-170. The Supreme Court of Virginia has held that proof of knowledge is necessary to support a conviction for violation of the…”
Levar Donnie Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 4× “Levar Donnie Richardson (appellant) appeals from his convictions for uttering, in violation of Code § 18.2-170, and obtaining and attempting to obtain money by false pretenses, in violation of Code §§ 18.”
Campbell v. Com., 409 S.E.2d 21 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “2-169; forging coins, bank notes or currency, Code § 18.2-170; possession of instruments for forging a writing, Code § 18.”
Hawkins v. Commonwealth (Va. 2014).
· cites it 3× “Hawkins was indicted in the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth for the possession of more than ten forged bank notes, as described in Code § 18.2-170, with the knowledge that they were forged and with the intent to utter or employ them as true.”
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-170(1): 1 case
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-170(2): 1 case
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-170(3): 3 cases
Levar Donnie Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
“Levar Donnie Richardson (appellant) appeals from his convictions for uttering, in violation of Code § 18.2-170, and obtaining and attempting to obtain money by false pretenses, in violation of Code §§ 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.