Va. Code » Title 32.1. Health » Chapter 1. Administration Generally » Article 4. Procedures; Inspections; Orders; Penalties; Representation by Attorney General
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 32.1-24 (2026)

Applicability of Administrative Process Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.) shall govern the procedures for rendering all case decisions, as defined in § 2.2-4001, and issuing all orders and regulations under the provisions of this Code administered by the Board, the Commissioner or the Department unless exempt from the Administrative Process Act.

1979, c. 711.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2016 · leading case: Cherrie v. Virginia Health Servs., 787 S.E.2d 855 (Va. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cherrie v. Virginia Health Servs., 787 S.E.2d 855 (Va. 2016). · cites it 4× “Under Code § 32.1-24, individual "case decisions" are then subject to the Administrative Process Act, Code §§ 2.”
Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 369 S.E.2d 1 (Va. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “The Commissioner also had the right to consider travel time data as well as information concerning obstetrical bed utilization at Southside Community Hospital in Prince Edward County, Virginia.”
Sentara Norfolk Gen. Hosp. v. State Health Comm'r, 516 S.E.2d 690 (Va. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The court held that the Commissioner’s reliance on extra-record evidence and “institutional knowledge” regarding organ donation rates did not result in substantial prejudice to Sentara.”
Georgetown Univ. v. Peterson, 54 Va. Cir. 383 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2001). · cites it 3× “Code §§ 9-6.14:1 to 9-6.14:25, governs the review to be applied by a Circuit Court when reviewing an appeal from an administrative agency such as the Department of Health.”
Riverside Hosp., Inc. v. Stroube, 61 Va. Cir. 331 (2003). · cites it 3× “Va. Code § 32.1-24; See, Roanoke Memorial Hospitals v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.