Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-206.1 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Acts 2008, cc. 656 and 657, cl. 1, effective March 27, 2008.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2007–2010 · leading case: Williamson v. Virginia Emp. Comm'n, 690 S.E.2d 304 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
Williamson v. Virginia Emp. Comm'n, 690 S.E.2d 304 (Va. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× ““all violations,” appellant’s proposed changes limited his exposure to the civil remedy fees imposed by Code § 46.2-206.1. 6 This *24 statute is limited to driving under suspension or revocation, reckless driving, driving while intoxicated, and any other misdemeanors or felony…”
Minter v. Commonwealth, 74 Va. Cir. 336 (Roanoke County Cir. Ct. 2007). · cites it 36× “In the instant case, the plaintiffs have alleged that Va. Code § 46.2-206.1 is unconstitutional and have elected to assert their constitutional challenges by declaratory judgment action rather than as part of his or her defense against the underlying traffic charge.”
Commonwealth v. Price, 73 Va. Cir. 509 (Henrico Cir. Ct. 2007). · cites it 25× “00 civil remedial fees as required by Va. Code § 46.2-206.1, the defendant moved the court to dismiss the statute as unconstitutional, to which the Commonwealth responded.”
Commonwealth v. Fields, 74 Va. Cir. 194 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 2007). · cites it 24× “Prior to the Court’s assessing the civil remedial fees as required under Va. Code § 46.2-206.1, Defendant’s counsel argued that the fees should not be imposed because the statute violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-206.1(A): 1 case
Commonwealth v. Price, 73 Va. Cir. 509 (Henrico Cir. Ct. 2007). “00 civil remedial fees as required by Va. Code § 46.2-206.1, the defendant moved the court to dismiss the statute as unconstitutional, to which the Commonwealth responded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.