Va. Code » Title 54.1. Professions and Occupations » Subtitle II. Professions and Occupations Regulated by the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation and Boards within the Department » Chapter 5.
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-516 (2026)

Disciplinary actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In addition to the applicable provisions of §§ 54.1-201 and 54.1-202, the Board may reprimand, fine, suspend or revoke (i) the license of a lead contractor, lead inspector, lead risk assessor, lead project designer, lead supervisor, lead worker, asbestos contractor, asbestos supervisor, asbestos inspector, asbestos analytical laboratory, asbestos management planner, asbestos project designer, asbestos project monitor, asbestos worker, or home inspector or (ii) the approval of an accredited asbestos training program, accredited lead training program, training manager or principal instructor, if the licensee or approved person or program:

1. Fraudulently or deceptively obtains or attempts to obtain a license or approval;

2. Fails at any time to meet the qualifications for a license or approval or to comply with the requirements of this chapter or any regulation adopted by the Board; or

3. Fails to meet any applicable federal or state standard when performing an asbestos project or service or performing lead-based paint activities.

B. In addition to the applicable provisions of §§ 54.1-201 and 54.1-202, the Board may reprimand, fine, suspend or revoke the license of (i) any asbestos contractor who employs or permits an individual without an asbestos supervisor's or worker's license to work on an asbestos project or (ii) any lead contractor who employs or permits an individual without a lead supervisor's or lead worker's license to work on a lead abatement project.

C. In addition to the applicable provisions of §§ 54.1-201 and 54.1-202, the Board may reprimand, fine, suspend or revoke the license of a home inspector.

1987, c. 579, § 54-145.10:10; 1988, cc. 765, 802; 1989, c. 397; 1990, c. 823; 1993, c. 660; 1994, cc. 185, 911; 1996, cc. 180, 846; 1997, c. 885; 1998, c. 739; 2001, c. 723; 2009, cc. 358, 819; 2012, cc. 803, 835; 2016, cc. 161, 436; 2024, cc. 93, 94; 2026, c. 772.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2001 · leading case: Dep't of Prof'l & Occupational Reg. v. Abateco Servs., Inc., 534 S.E.2d 352 (Va. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dep't of Prof'l & Occupational Reg. v. Abateco Servs., Inc., 534 S.E.2d 352 (Va. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 20× “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Dept of Prof. & Occupational Reg. v. Abateco (Va. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 7× “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Abateco Servs. v. Dept.of Prof. Occup. Reg., etc (Va. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 7× “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-516(A)(3): 3 cases
Dep't of Prof'l & Occupational Reg. v. Abateco Servs., Inc., 534 S.E.2d 352 (Va. Ct. App. 2000). “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Dept of Prof. & Occupational Reg. v. Abateco (Va. Ct. App. 2001). “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Abateco Servs. v. Dept.of Prof. Occup. Reg., etc (Va. Ct. App. 2001). “Thus, in my opinion, the trial judge did not err in ruling that the Board had no basis upon which to impose civil penalties under Code §§ 54.1-516 or 54.1-517. In Abateco, we held only that the Department retained a contractual right of entry that negated any privacy claim that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.