Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 14.08.340 (2026)
Interpretation and construction
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This act shall be so interpreted and construed as to make uniform so far as possible the laws and regulations of this state and other states and of the government of the United States having to do with the subject of aeronautics.
[ 1945 c 182 s 17; Rem. Supp. 1945 s 2722-46.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: Branson v. Port of Seattle, 152 Wash. 2d 862 (Wash. 2004).
Branson v. Port of Seattle, 152 Wash. 2d 862 (Wash. 2004). “” RCW 14.08.340. As an initial matter, Branson argues that any interpretation of the RAA depends in part upon whether the power to set concession fees is governmental or proprietary.”
Branson v. Port of Seattle, 101 P.3d 67 (Wash. 2004). “[1] Additionally, the legislature directed the courts to *71 interpret the RAA "to make uniform so far as possible the laws and regulations of this state and other states and of the government of the United States having to do with the subject of aeronautics.”
Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac, 357 P.3d 1040 (Wash. 2015). “RCW 14.08.340. Additionally, the law detailing the specific powers of municipalities operating airports, RCW 14.”
Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac (Wash. 2015). “RCW 14.08.340. Additionally, the law detailing the specific powers of municipalities operating airports, RCW 14.”
Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac (Wash. 2015). “RCW 14.08.340. Additionally, the law detailing the specific powers of municipalities operating airports, RCW 14.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.