Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.16
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.16.500 (2026)

Public bodies may retain collection agencies to collect public debts—Fees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1)(a) Agencies, departments, taxing districts, political subdivisions of the state, counties, and cities may retain, by written contract, collection agencies licensed under this chapter for the purpose of collecting public debts owed by any person, including any restitution that is being collected on behalf of a crime victim.
(b) Any governmental entity as described in (a) of this subsection using a collection agency may add a reasonable fee, payable by the debtor, to the outstanding debt for the collection agency fee incurred or to be incurred. The amount to be paid for collection services shall be left to the agreement of the governmental entity and its collection agency or agencies, but a contingent fee of up to fifty percent of the first one hundred thousand dollars of the unpaid debt per account and up to thirty-five percent of the unpaid debt over one hundred thousand dollars per account is reasonable, and a minimum fee of the full amount of the debt up to one hundred dollars per account is reasonable. Any fee agreement entered into by a governmental entity is presumptively reasonable.
(2) No debt may be assigned to a collection agency unless (a) there has been an attempt to advise the debtor (i) of the existence of the debt and (ii) that the debt may be assigned to a collection agency for collection if the debt is not paid, and (b) at least thirty days have elapsed from the time notice was attempted.
(3) Collection agencies assigned debts under this section shall have only those remedies and powers which would be available to them as assignees of private creditors.
(4) For purposes of this section, the term debt shall include fines and other debts, including the fee allowed under subsection (1)(b) of this section.
[ 2011 c 57 s 2; 1997 c 387 s 1; 1982 c 65 s 1.]

Notes:

Interest rate: RCW 43.17.240.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: State Of Washington v. Terry Eugene Gaines, 479 P.3d 735 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Of Washington v. Terry Eugene Gaines, 479 P.3d 735 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 5× “RCW 19.16.500(1)(a) states that a public agency may retain collection agencies to collect public debts, including restitution being collected on behalf of a crime victim.”
Pamela Gillie v. Law Off. of Eric A. Jones, 785 F.3d 1091 (6th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “231 ; Wash. Rev. Code § 19.16.500 . One State’s collections-assignment scheme bears more than a passing resemblance to Ohio’s.”
In Re Games, 213 B.R. 773 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1997). “RCW 19.16.500 which deals with costs in such cases has since been amended to define the fine as including the costs of collection.”
Fairway Collections, Llc, Res/cross-app V. Michael I. Turner, App/cross-resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “” Fairway argued that “[t]he amount of the collection cost is not an issue in this case” because it “had the right to charge [Turner] a collection cost under RCW 19.16.500.” On February 22, Turner filed an amended motion for leave to amend.”
State Of Washington v. Anthony T. Clark (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “780, and RCW 19.16.500. Although collection costs are discretionary, they do not meet the definition of “cost’ in RCW 10.”
State v. Danielson (Wash. 2025). “RCW 19.16.500. They may impose a “collection fee” of 35 percent of unpaid debt over $100,000.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 19.16.500(1)(a): 1 case
State Of Washington v. Terry Eugene Gaines, 479 P.3d 735 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “RCW 19.16.500(1)(a) states that a public agency may retain collection agencies to collect public debts, including restitution being collected on behalf of a crime victim.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 19.16.500(1)(b): 2 cases
State Of Washington v. Terry Eugene Gaines, 479 P.3d 735 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “RCW 19.16.500(1)(a) states that a public agency may retain collection agencies to collect public debts, including restitution being collected on behalf of a crime victim.”
Fairway Collections, Llc, Res/cross-app V. Michael I. Turner, App/cross-resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “” Fairway argued that “[t]he amount of the collection cost is not an issue in this case” because it “had the right to charge [Turner] a collection cost under RCW 19.16.500.” On February 22, Turner filed an amended motion for leave to amend.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.