Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.190.100 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The legislature finds that the practices covered by this chapter are matters vitally affecting the public interest for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW. A violation of this chapter is not reasonable in relation to the development and preservation of business, and is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce and an unfair method of competition for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW.

[ 2005 c 378 s 4.]

Notes:

Severability—2005 c 378: See note following RCW 19.190.080.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case: Gragg v. Orange Cab Co., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1046 (W.D. Wash. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gragg v. Orange Cab Co., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1046 (W.D. Wash. 2015). “RCW 19.190.100. The legislative history declares that “[a] violation, of these provisions is defined as an unfair or deceptive act for purposes of applying the Consumer Protection Act.”

Frank v. Cannabis & Glass LLC (E.D. Wash. 2019). · cites it 2× “Wash. Rev. Code § 19.190.100 (1). “Initiate the 14 transmission” refers to the action by the original sender of an electronic mail 15 message or an electronic text message but excludes an intervening interactive 16 computer service, unless the service knows, or actively avoids…”

Latimer v. AT&T Mobility LLC (W.D. Wash. 2022). “093) such as CEMA 7 (RCW 19.190.100), and other courts have generally applied the CPA’s four-year statute of 8 limitations for claims under RCW 19.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.