Wash. Rev. Code » Title 2 · Chapter 2.14
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 2.14.020 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
(1) "Plan" means the judicial retirement account plan.
(2) "Principal account" means the judicial retirement principal account.
(3) "Member" means a judge participating in the judicial retirement account plan.
(4) "Administrative account" means the judicial retirement administrative account.
(5) "Accumulated contributions" means the total amount contributed to a member's account under RCW 2.14.090 (1) and (2), together with any interest and earnings that have been credited to the member's account.
[ 1988 c 109 s 13.]

Notes:

Effective date—1988 c 109: See note following RCW 2.10.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2021 · leading case: Ralph v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 343 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ralph v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 343 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2014). “3d 1192 (2003) (party “ ‘shall have the option’ ” of suing in county where action arose or county where defendant resides (quoting former RCW 2.14.020(3) (1941))); Shoop v. Kittitas County, 149 Wn.”
Jane Koler/land Use & Prop. Law, Pllc, Apps V. City Of Black Diamond, Et Ano., Resps (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “” BDMC § 2.14.020. Prior to that date, the BDMC lacked any provisions governing the process of selecting a city attorney.”
Ralph v. Dep't of Nat. Res. (Wash. 2014). “3d 1192 (2003) (party '"shall have the option"' of suing in county where action arose or county where defendant resides (quoting former RCW 2.14.020(3) (1941 ))); Shoop v. Kittitas County, 149 Wn.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 2.14.020(3): 2 cases
Ralph v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 343 P.3d 342 (Wash. 2014). “3d 1192 (2003) (party “ ‘shall have the option’ ” of suing in county where action arose or county where defendant resides (quoting former RCW 2.14.020(3) (1941))); Shoop v. Kittitas County, 149 Wn.”
Ralph v. Dep't of Nat. Res. (Wash. 2014). “3d 1192 (2003) (party '"shall have the option"' of suing in county where action arose or county where defendant resides (quoting former RCW 2.14.020(3) (1941 ))); Shoop v. Kittitas County, 149 Wn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.