Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 2.32.250 (2026)

Transcript accorded verity

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The report of the official reporter employed by the court or other certified court reporter, or authorized transcriptionist, when transcribed and certified as being a correct transcript of the stenographic notes or electronically recorded testimony, or other oral proceedings had in the matter, shall be prima facie a correct statement of such testimony or other oral proceedings had, and the same may thereafter, in any civil cause, be read in evidence as competent testimony, when satisfactory proof is offered to the judge presiding that the witness originally giving such testimony is then dead or without the jurisdiction of the court, subject, however, to all objections the same as though such witness were present and giving such testimony in person.
[ 2016 c 74 s 2; 1913 c 126 s 6; RRS s 42-6.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Raymond Budd & Vickie Budd, V. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 505 P.3d 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2022).
Raymond Budd & Vickie Budd, V. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 505 P.3d 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “On October 19, Kaiser moved to correct the record under RCW 2.32.250. The court denied the motion, saying that it was moot because the jury had issued a verdict and correction would not change the verdict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.