Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 25.15.386 (2026)

Right to bring action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A member may bring a derivative action to enforce a right of a limited liability company if:
(1) The member first makes a demand on the members in a member-managed limited liability company, or on the managers of a manager-managed limited liability company, requesting that they cause the limited liability company to bring an action to enforce the right, and the managers or other members do not bring the action within a reasonable time; or
(2) A demand would be futile.
[ 2015 c 188 s 75.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2026 · leading case: Selina Boland, Res/cross-app, V. Shu-mei Wang & Beijing Men, App/cross-res (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
Selina Boland, Res/cross-app, V. Shu-mei Wang & Beijing Men, App/cross-res (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 7× “Boland sought to add a statutory derivative claim on behalf of BCH under RCW 25.15.386 3 for Wang’s wrongful withdrawal of $433,700 from BCH’s bank account exceeding her capital contributions and share of profits.”
Li David Yi, V. The Xcj Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “1; RCW 25.15.386, .396. However, “[d]erivative suits are disfavored and may be brought only in exceptional circumstances.”
Oleg A. Kiforenko V. Ross H. Moore, Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “” RCW 25.15.386, .391. Similarly, “fiduciary duties arise from the [members’] relationship to each other.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.