Wash. Rev. Code » Title 28C · Chapter 28C.10
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28C.10.130 (2026)

Violations—Civil penalties—Consumer protection act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Any private vocational school or agent violating RCW 28C.10.060, 28C.10.090, or 28C.10.110 or the applicable agency rules is subject to a civil penalty of not more than one hundred dollars for each separate violation. Each day on which a violation occurs constitutes a separate violation. Multiple violations on a single day may be considered separate violations. The fine may be imposed by the agency under RCW 28C.10.120, or in any court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) In addition to the penalties authorized pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, any violation of any provision of this chapter is also a violation of RCW 19.86.020 of the consumer protection act, pursuant to RCW 28C.10.210. The penalties authorized under subsection (1) of this section do not preclude remedies available under the provisions of the consumer protection act.
[ 2018 c 203 s 8; 1986 c 299 s 13.]

Notes:

Finding—Intent—2018 c 203: See note following RCW 28B.85.095.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: State Of Washington, V. Joshua Jordan (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Of Washington, V. Joshua Jordan (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “The PVSA authorizes, among other things, civil penalties for a violation of its provisions, see RCW 28C.10.130, and any violation of the PVSA “affects the public interest and is an unfair or deceptive - 30 - No.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 28C.10.130(1): 1 case
State Of Washington, V. Joshua Jordan (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “The PVSA authorizes, among other things, civil penalties for a violation of its provisions, see RCW 28C.10.130, and any violation of the PVSA “affects the public interest and is an unfair or deceptive - 30 - No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.