Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 3.66.130 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the party or entity for whom a court-ordered restitution obligation has been entered pursuant to this title seeks to enforce the judgment as a lien on real estate, he or she shall commence a lien of judgment upon the real estate of the judgment debtor/obligor as provided in RCW 4.56.200.

When any court-ordered restitution obligation entered pursuant to this title is paid or satisfied, the clerk of the court of limited jurisdiction in which the restitution obligation was ordered shall note upon the record of the court of limited jurisdiction satisfaction thereof including the date of the satisfaction.

[ 2001 c 115 s 2.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: City of Seattle v. Fuller, 300 P.3d 340 (Wash. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Seattle v. Fuller, 300 P.3d 340 (Wash. 2013). · cites it 3× “” Similarly, RCW 3.66.130 refers to “any court-ordered restitution obligation entered pursuant to [Title 3 RCW]”; however, the only statute under Title 3 RCW that could authorize restitution is RCW 3.”

City of Seattle v. Fuller (Wash. 2013). · cites it 4× “130 refers to "any court-ordered restitution obligation entered pursuant to [Title 3 RCW]"; however, the only statute under Title 3 that could authorize restitution is RCW 3.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.