Wash. Rev. Code » Title 42 · Chapter 42.52
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 42.52.440 (2026)

Review of order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided by law, reconsideration or judicial review of an ethics board's order that a violation of this chapter or rules adopted under it has occurred shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW applicable to review of adjudicative proceedings.
[ 1994 c 154 s 214.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: Knudsen v. Washington State Exec. Ethics Bd., 156 Wash. App. 852 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Knudsen v. Washington State Exec. Ethics Bd., 156 Wash. App. 852 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “RCW 42.52.440. This court stands in the same position as the superior court, reviewing the Board’s order independently of the superior court review.”
Knudsen v. Wash. State Exec. Ethics Bd., 235 P.3d 835 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Knudsen appealed to the superior court, which affirmed the Board's decision.”
Brady Horenstein v. Exec. Ethics Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “RCW 42.52.440. The Ethics Board’s order is filed after a hearing on the complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.