Wash. Rev. Code » Title 43 · Chapter 43.10
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 43.10.150 (2026)

Legal services revolving fund—Created—Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A legal services revolving fund is hereby created in the state treasury for the purpose of a centralized funding, accounting, and distribution of the actual costs of the legal services provided to agencies of the state government by the attorney general. During the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, the legislature may transfer from the legal services revolving account to the state general fund such amounts as reflect the excess fund balance of the account.
[ 2013 2nd sp.s. c 4 s 975; 1974 ex.s. c 146 s 1; 1971 ex.s. c 71 s 1.]

Notes:

Effective dates—2013 2nd sp.s. c 4: See note following RCW 2.68.020.
Effective date—1974 ex.s. c 146: "This act shall take effect on July 1, 1974 for costs, billings and charges affecting the 1975 fiscal year and subsequent biennia." [ 1974 ex.s. c 146 s 5.]
Legal services revolving fund—Approval of certain changes required: RCW 43.88.350.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1980 · leading case: State ex rel. Burlington N., Inc. v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 609 P.2d 1375 (Wash. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Burlington N., Inc. v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 609 P.2d 1375 (Wash. 1980). “130; the costs of legal services from the Legal Services Revolving Fund, RCW 43.10.150. The legislature has also provided for reimbursement of these special funds in most cases from the moneys of the state department or agency whose activities caused the expenditure.”
State v. Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 609 P.2d 1375 (Wash. 1980). “130; the costs of legal services from the Legal Services Revolving Fund, RCW 43.10.150. The legislature has also provided for reimbursement of these special funds in most cases from the moneys of the state department or agency whose activities caused the expenditure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.