Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 58.17.330 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) As an alternative to those provisions of this chapter requiring a planning commission to hear and issue recommendations for plat approval, the county or city legislative body may adopt a hearing examiner system and shall specify by ordinance the legal effect of the decisions made by the examiner. The legal effect of such decisions shall include one of the following:
(a) The decision may be given the effect of a recommendation to the legislative body;
(b) The decision may be given the effect of an administrative decision appealable within a specified time limit to the legislative body; or
(c) The decision may be given the effect of a final decision of the legislative body.
The legislative authority shall prescribe procedures to be followed by a hearing examiner.
(2) Each final decision of a hearing examiner shall be in writing and shall include findings and conclusions, based on the record, to support the decision. Each final decision of a hearing examiner, unless a longer period is mutually agreed to by the applicant and the hearing examiner, shall be rendered within ten working days following conclusion of all testimony and hearings.
Notes:
Finding—Severability—Part headings and table of contents not law—1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.
Severability—1994 c 257: See note following RCW 36.70A.270.
Severability—1977 ex.s. c 213: See note following RCW 35.63.130.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1982–2016 · leading case: South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King Cnty., 677 P.2d 114 (Wash. 1984).
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King Cnty., 677 P.2d 114 (Wash. 1984). “RCW 58.17.330 grants to counties the authority to adopt the hearing examiner system for acting on subdivision plat applications: As an alternative to those provisions of this chapter requiring a planning commission to hear and issue recommendations for plat approval, the county…”
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n for Pres. of Neighborhood Saf. & Env't v. King Cnty., 653 P.2d 1324 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982). “The County has adopted the "hearing examiner system" sanctioned by RCW 58.17.330. In doing so it has elected to limit the legal effect of the examiner's decisions to a mere recommendation to the council, as opposed to a final decision.”
Mark Avolio v. Cedars Golf, Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “In the procedure it describes for the alteration of approved subdivisions, the BMC specifies that where a public hearing is requested or required for 5 RCW 58.17.330 simply explains the procedures required of the hearing examiner system, including that the decision be in writing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.