Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 7.68.300 (2026)
Finding
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[ 1993 c 288 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: State Of Washington, V. James Laron Ellis, 530 P.3d 1048 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
State Of Washington, V. James Laron Ellis, 530 P.3d 1048 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “” RCW 7.68.300. Former RCW 9.94A.750(4) (2018) states that “the court may not reduce the total amount of restitution ordered because the offender may lack the ability to pay the total amount.”
State v. Letourneau, 997 P.2d 436 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “" RCW 7.68.300. These statutes establish the means by which the Legislature has chosen to advance these compelling state interestsby seizing and distributing properties acquired by reason of the convicted person's commercialization of the crime and placing the funds in escrow…”
State v. Letourneau, 100 Wash. App. 424 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “” RCW 7.68.300. These statutes establish the means by which the Legislature has chosen to advance these compelling state interests — by seizing and distributing properties acquired by reason of the convicted person’s commercialization of the crime and placing the funds in escrow…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.