Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 79.71.130 (2026)
Distribution of amount in lieu of real property taxes, weed control assessment
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The state treasurer, on behalf of the department, must distribute to counties for all lands acquired for the purposes of this chapter an amount in lieu of real property taxes equal to the amount of tax that would be due if the land were taxable as open space land under chapter 84.34 RCW except taxes levied for any state purpose, plus an additional amount equal to the amount of weed control assessment that would be due if such lands were privately owned. The county assessor and county legislative authority shall assist in determining the appropriate calculation of the amount of tax that would be due. The county shall distribute the amount received under this section in lieu of real property taxes to all property taxing districts except the state in appropriate tax code areas the same way it would distribute local property taxes from private property. The county shall distribute the amount received under this section for weed control to the appropriate weed district.
[ 2005 c 303 s 12.]
Notes:
Effective date—2005 c 303 ss 1-14: See note following RCW 79A.15.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2016–2020 · leading case: City of Snoqualmie v. King Cnty. Exec. Dow Constantine, 386 P.3d 279 (Wash. 2016).
City of Snoqualmie v. King Cnty. Exec. Dow Constantine, 386 P.3d 279 (Wash. 2016). “201; RCW 79.71.130. ¶6 Various Washington tribes took advantage of the 2014 amendment expanding the off-reservation tribal property exemption for around 190 properties.”
Kittitas Cnty., V Wa State Dep't Of Transp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “Additionally, RCW 79.71.130 provides that the State, on behalf of the Department of Natural Resources, renders PILTs to counties for the amount of real property taxes the State would have owed if it were a private landowner.”
City of Snoqualmie v. King Cnty. Exec. Constantine (Wash. 2016). “201; RCW 79.71.130. Various Washington tribes took advantage of the 2014 amendment expanding the off-reservation tribal property exemption for around 190 properties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.