Wash. Rev. Code » Title 85 · Chapter 85.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 85.05.010 (2026)

Districts authorized—Powers—Management

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any portion of a county requiring diking may be organized into a diking district, and when so organized, such district, and the board of commissioners hereinafter provided for, shall have and possess the power herein conferred or that may hereafter be conferred by law upon such district and board of commissioners, and said district shall be known and designated as diking district No. . . . . (here insert number) of the county of . . . . . . (here insert the name of county) of the state of Washington, and shall have the right to sue and be sued by and in the name of its board of commissioners hereinafter provided for, and shall have perpetual succession, and shall adopt and use a seal. The commissioners hereinafter provided for, and their successors in office, shall, from the time of the organization of such diking district, have the power, and it shall be their duty, to manage and conduct the business and affairs of the district; make and execute all necessary contracts, employ and appoint such agents, officers and employees as may be required, and prescribe their duties, and perform such other acts as hereinafter provided, or that may hereafter be provided by law.
[ 1921 c 146 s 1; 1895 c 117 s 1; RRS s 4236. Cf. 1888 p 90 s 1; Code 1881 s 2519. Formerly RCW 85.04.005, part.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–1999 · leading case: Halverson v. Skagit Cnty., 983 P.2d 643 (Wash. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Halverson v. Skagit Cnty., 983 P.2d 643 (Wash. 1999). “The County’s repairs or improvements, even if in a concerted effort with the independent diking districts, do not, as a matter of law, render them liable for the mere existence of those levees.”
Halvorson v. Skagit Cnty., 983 P.2d 643 (Wash. 1999). “The County's repairs or improvements, even if in a concerted effort with the independent diking districts, do not, as a matter of law, render them liable for the mere existence of those levees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.