Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.95
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.900 (2026)

Application of certain laws to felonies committed before, on, or after certain dates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the following sections of law do not apply to any felony offense committed on or after July 1, 1984: RCW 9.95.010, 9.95.011, 9.95.013, 9.95.015, 9.95.017, 9.95.040, 9.95.045, 9.95.047, 9.95.052, 9.95.080, 9.95.100, 9.95.115, 9.95.116, 9.95.120, 9.95.124, 9.95.125, 9.95.130, 9.95.190, 9.95.200, 9.95.204, * 9.95.206, 9.95.210, * 9.95.212, 9.95.214, 9.95.220, 9.95.230, 9.95.240, 9.95.250, 9.95.260, 9.95.265, 9.95.280, 9.95.290, 9.95.310, 9.95.320, 9.95.330, 9.95.340, 9.95.350, 9.95.360, 9.95.370, 72.04A.070, and 72.04A.080.
(2) The following sections apply to any felony offense committed before July 1, 1984, and to any offense sentenced under RCW 9.94A.507 and committed on or after July 1, 2001: RCW 9.95.003, 9.95.005, 9.95.007, 9.95.020, 9.95.030, 9.95.031, 9.95.032, 9.95.055, 9.95.060, 9.95.062, 9.95.063, 9.95.064, 9.95.070, 9.95.090, 9.95.110, 9.95.121, 9.95.122, 9.95.123, 9.95.126, 9.95.140, 9.95.150, 9.95.160, 9.95.170, 9.95.300, and 9.96.050.
[ 2009 c 28 s 31; 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 s 353; 1981 c 137 s 32.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: RCW 9.95.206 and 9.95.212 were repealed by 2009 c 375 s 16.
Effective date—2009 c 28: See note following RCW 2.24.040.
Intent—Severability—Effective dates—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12: See notes following RCW 71.09.250.
Application—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 ss 301-363: See note following RCW 9.94A.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Addleman v. Bd. of Prison Terms & Paroles, 730 P.2d 1327 (Wash. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Addleman v. Bd. of Prison Terms & Paroles, 730 P.2d 1327 (Wash. 1986). “RCW 9.95.900. The Legislature had until 1988 to establish a mechanism whereby the still applicable functions of the Board for pre-July 1, 1984 prisoners could be performed.”
In Re Reise, 192 P.3d 949 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “RCW 9.95.900; Addleman v. Bd. of Prison Terms & Paroles, 107 Wash.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Reise, 146 Wash. App. 772 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “RCW 9.95.900; Addleman v. Bd. of Prison Terms & Paroles, 107 Wn.”
State v. Whitaker, 771 P.2d 332 (Wash. 1989). · cites it 2× “900, RCW 9.95.900, RCW 9.94A.905. See D. Boerner, Sentencing in Washington § 4.”
State v. Thomas, 155 P.3d 998 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 9.95.900(1). [3] RCW 9A.20.030(1) authorizes imposition of restitution in lieu of imposing certain fines and, in relevant part, provides the sentencing court authority to order a defendant who "gained money or property or caused a victim to lose money or property through the…”
In Re Pers. Restraint of Hunter, 723 P.2d 431 (Wash. 1986). · cites it 2× “7 RCW 9.95.900. 8 RCW 9.94A.300, .905. 9 RCW 9.”
State v. Thomas, 138 Wash. App. 78 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 9.95.900(1). RCW 9A.20.030(1) authorizes imposition of restitution in lieu of imposing certain fines and, in relevant part, provides the sentencing court authority to order a defendant who “gained money or property or caused a victim to lose money or property through the…”
In Re the Pers. Restraint of Mayner, 730 P.2d 1321 (Wash. 1986). “Because the murder for which Mayner was convicted occurred prior to July 1, 1984, the restart statute was properly applied to him.”
In Re the Pers. Restraint of Rolston, 732 P.2d 166 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987). “The Legislature, in enacting the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, provided for determinate sentencing effective July 1, 1984. It also provided for the gradual phaseout of the former indeterminate sentencing system.”
Forster v. Pierce Cnty., 991 P.2d 687 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “See RCW 9.95.900. 12 Compare Laws of 1955, ch.”
In re the Det. of Hovinga, 132 Wash. App. 16 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “The Board of Prison Terms and Paroles is authorized to release a defendant on parole “after such convicted person has served the period of confinement fixed for him or her by the board, less time credits for good behavior and diligence in work.”
State v. Hawkins, 769 P.2d 856 (Wash. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “In enacting the SRA, the Legislature established a new system of determinate sentencing, effective July 1, 1984, and provided for the gradual phaseout of the former indeterminate sentencing system.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.900(1) — 3 cases
State v. Thomas, 155 P.3d 998 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 9.95.900(1). [3] RCW 9A.20.030(1) authorizes imposition of restitution in lieu of imposing certain fines and, in relevant part, provides the sentencing court authority to order a defendant who "gained money or property or caused a victim to lose money or property through the…”
State v. Thomas, 138 Wash. App. 78 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 9.95.900(1). RCW 9A.20.030(1) authorizes imposition of restitution in lieu of imposing certain fines and, in relevant part, provides the sentencing court authority to order a defendant who “gained money or property or caused a victim to lose money or property through the…”
Austin J. Benson v. State Of Washington, 419 P.3d 484 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.