Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9A · Chapter 9A.46
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.46.100 (2026)

"Convicted," time when

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in RCW 9.61.230, * 9.61.260, 9A.46.020, or 9A.46.110, a person has been "convicted" at such time as a plea of guilty has been accepted or a verdict of guilty has been filed, notwithstanding the pendency of any future proceedings including but not limited to sentencing, posttrial motions, and appeals.
[ 2004 c 94 s 5; 1992 c 186 s 5; 1985 c 288 s 10.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: RCW 9.61.260 was recodified as RCW 9A.90.120 pursuant to 2022 c 231 s 4.
Severability—Effective dates—2004 c 94: See notes following RCW 9A.90.120.
Severability—1992 c 186: See note following RCW 9A.46.110.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2003 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 957 P.2d 1270 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jackson, 957 P.2d 1270 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “*492 First, the definition of “conviction” relied on by the trial court is found in RCW 9A.46.100, which provides: “Convicted,” time when.”
State v. Carpenter, 117 Wash. App. 673 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “110 (stalking), conviction under the harassment statute RCW 9A.46.100 states, “a person has been ‘convicted’ at such time as a plea of guilty has been accepted or a verdict of guilty has been filed, notwithstanding the pendency of any future proceedings including but not limited…”
State v. Carpenter, 72 P.3d 784 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “110 (stalking), conviction under the harassment statute RCW 9A.46.100 states, "a person has been `convicted' at such time as a plea of guilty has been accepted or a verdict of guilty has been filed, notwithstanding the pendency of any future proceedings including but not limited…”
State v. Rice, 64 P.3d 651 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “4 In Jackson, this court applied the definition of “conviction” found in RCW 9A.46.100 to the same term found in former RCW 10.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.